Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter just reported Fitz is on the block


Ruff

Recommended Posts

Restructure.

And so what if he's 30? He's not a speed guy.

I'm thinking long term here. I wouldn't mind having him, but for the right price.

His contract is enormous, I think it's supposed to be 18 mil next season.

Spotrac says he is due to make $12.75 million next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@AdamSchefter: A trade for Cards WR Larry Fitzgerald will be in play this off-season, in likely event a deal not completed before Tuesday’s trade deadline.

@AdamSchefter: Come off-season, Larry Fitzgerald and Cards will be on clock, when some believe a divorce is somewhere between possible and inevitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno. Schefter said 18mil. :/

 

That's his cap hit. Which includes the signing bonus designation. Any team that acquired him via trade would only be on the hook for his base salary which is 12.7 in 2014 and 8 in 2015.

 

Of course it goes up to essentially 15 from 2016-18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man you folks are out of your mind if you wouldn't take him IF he restructured his deal....and we all know Gettleman is a restructure kinda GM....and didn't have to give up a kings ransom in regards to draft picks. Having him on our team would probably have added two more wins for us this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol the people saying that Fitzgerald's best days are behind him are likely the same people who think height and straight line speed are essential parts of having a good wide receiver.

He has played in the NFL for a decade....his best days aren't yet to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...