Cam's Contract if the season ended today

[Ruff]

You would trade the player that lost the QB battle for numerous high picks and / or a top upcoming player.

This is ridiculous. Do you know how long it takes to see how good a player is? Three years is the average. So, you're saying you would draft Winston. Let him and Cam play for three years. Then, at the end of those three years, trade for picks?

Again, thank god you do not have any control over an NFL team. Hell, I worry about your madden franchise.

[Dash Global]

If Winston is that good, then trading down would definitely be an option. The redskins just traded up to get bob.

These hypotheticals are stupid.

 

Missing the point. 

 

Trade down is not an option. Only a fool would not take Winston. 

 

Worry about what to do with him and Cam later. 

 

I dont think you realize how good or perceived good Winston is. 

 

More dynamic than Luck. 

 

More durable / bigger than RG3.

 

More of a pocket passer than Cam. (his knock out of college anyway)

[Dash Global]

This is ridiculous. Do you know how long it takes to see how good a player is? Three years is the average. So, you're saying you would draft Winston. Let him and Cam play for three years. Then, at the end of those three years, trade for picks?

Again, thank god you do not have any control over an NFL team. Hell, I worry about your madden franchise.

 

No I would trade him within 1 year. 

 

You think a team would be willing to trade the farm on draft day but then not later on (within 1 yr) for the same player? 

[Ruff]

No I would trade him within 1 year.

You think a team would be willing to trade the farm on draft day but then not later on for the same player?

Are you drunk?

Or do you just not realize how absurd you sound?

[Ruff]

But then again, I am arguing with Dash about NFL draft talk. I should've known what I was getting into.

[Dash Global]

Are you drunk?

Or do you just not realize how absurd you sound?

 

Your the one drinking, if you would pass Winston straight up for ANY 1 player in the draft. 

 

Talk about drafting a need over talent. lol 

[Dash Global]

But then again, I am arguing with Dash about NFL draft talk. I should've known what I was getting into.

 

Lets see, I mocked Short to us in the 2nd and pimped White as a sleeper / diamond in the rough. 

 

Yep, you should know what your getting into. 

[Ruff]

Your the one drinking, if you would pass Winston straight up for ANY 1 player in the draft.

Talk about drafting a need over talent. lol

No one would take one player over him. You would trade for the entire haul. You could get 8, 9, 10 players if you played your cards right.

[teeray]

When San Diego did that it worked out great.... for New Orleans.

[Dash Global]

No one would take one player over him. You would trade for the entire haul. You could get 8, 9, 10 players if you played your cards right.

 

No poo.

 

However, the question was hypothetical. 

 

You can not trade for picks, you must select 1 player. 

 

In which case you take Winston. 

[Ruff]

Lets see, I mocked Short to us in the 2nd and pimped White as a sleeper / diamond in the rough.

Yep, you should know what your getting into.

So, you read a lot of mocks of him coming to us and then said it yourself? Congrats! I'll call espn and let them know that they no longer need Todd or Mel.

[teeray]

No poo.

However, the question was hypothetical.

You can not trade for picks, you must select 1 player.

In which case you take Winston.

Who else is available in you hypothetical? Is there also an elite CB or WR?

You can't do a hypothetical at this point because we don't know who else is available in that draft.

Would you rather slightly upgrade one position, or vastly upgrade another position. Vastly upgrading a more pressing need will make your team better than slightly upgrading another position.

All that is even dependent on one accepting the fact that Winston even would be an upgrade over Cam which I am not so sure he is.

[Ruff]

Who else is available in you hypothetical? Is there also an elite CB or WR?

You can't do a hypothetical at this point because we don't know who else is available in that draft.

Would you rather slightly upgrade one position, or vastly upgrade another position. Vastly upgrading a more pressing need will make your team better than slightly upgrading another position.

All that is even dependent on one accepting the fact that Winston even would be an upgrade over Cam which I not so sure he is.

 

This is exactly why it doesn't make sense to me. You can't just say, "Well, in a vacuum, you can only select Jameis Winston. You can't trade. You can pick other players, but they're all way worse than Winston and faceless, who do you select?" I understand the point of hypotheticals, but this is just tailoring a scenario to fit into your argument. It's pointless, to be honest.

 

If we were to have the #1 pick in the 2016 Draft, a lot will have gone wrong with the team. That will also be the year that Cam's option on his contract will be running out, and we would have to make a decision about whether or not to extend him. Do we extend him? If so, then I would trade that #1 pick to gain multiple picks in that year's draft, multiple high round picks in the following year's draft (including a 1st and 2nd round), and anything else I could get. If we did not extend Cam, then I would say yes, I'll draft Winston and move on.

[teeray]

Well, fug it hopefully we will be picking somewhere in the high twenties or 30s by the time Winston comes out.

I do like Winston a lot and I do think he will be #1 overall when he does.

We have a QB that is becoming special even as he is still developing so my focus would be on signing him to an extension ASAP