Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Property rights and Easements Question


TANTRIC-NINJA

Recommended Posts

Sadly I cannot find ONE single person who will help me in all of SC in terms of understanding rights of the City vs. my property(back yard) rights. So I come to the place where we all pretend to know things....The Huddle.

I come home from work and see two guys with heavy machinery dropping off a storm drain basin in my back yard. It is 4x4 with a man hole cover and they were about to start digging in my yard.

The curb has a storm drain that runs under my property and the city decided to approve, desiginate my back yard as a place to put in a new storm drain to catch excessive water runoff from the other houses...never rally a problem in the 4 year I have lived in my house. I would not have bought it if it had a concrete eyesore postage stamped in the back yard. It will be about 6 inches off the ground.

I am pretty sure I am S.O.L but to not once be notified about this only finding out bc I walked upon it is total ASSSZ! The city does have easement rights and it is withing thiose lines.

Because I kicked the construction guys off my yard I had a meeting where the city planner, contracter and a rep from DR Horton come over and as I had concerns about someone cutting through my yard and injuring themselves on the drain(am I responsible?), being an eyesore devaluaing my property value and digging in the area tearing up my underground irrigation system.

They said they would replace and sod the affected areas, possible shrubbery to hide it and repair my irrigation system.

I do want to hurt these people but my ninja suit in is put away as I swore to never spill blood again.

Does anyone know if I have any right to delay this or appeal it as I have yet to get any notice despite alterations to my property and equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The property I grew up on had some land taken away to redo a road. There were several town council meetings (or some such nonsense) and my dad fought it all the way. We had 24 acres of pine woodland and my dad spent years making it look nice.

 

End of story was he got a weak check and there was jack-poop he could have done.

 

Anyway after that neat story...my point is there often is a process involved. What they have offered to do is probably fair under the law. I would like to think you could claim damages for decrease in your home vale. If you want to fight it I would get a lawyer and find out if the city missed a technicality or if there is some other obscure regulation you can use. Even if they weren't allowed to approach your property that will not stop them from doing what they are doing.

 

Good luck!

 

Also post pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The property I grew up on had some land taken away to redo a road. There were several town council meetings (or some such nonsense) and my dad fought it all the way. We had 24 acres of pine woodland and my dad spent years making it look nice.

End of story was he got a weak check and there was jack-poop he could have done.

Anyway after that neat story...my point is there often is a process involved. What they have offered to do is probably fair under the law. I would like to think you could claim damages for decrease in your home vale. If you want to fight it I would get a lawyer and find out if the city missed a technicality or if there is some other obscure regulation you can use. Even if they weren't allowed to approach your property that will not stop them from doing what they are doing.

Good luck!

Also post pictures.

Yeah every lawyer in Columbia(The fricking capital) put me off on someone else. I could not find anyone as I booted them off my property last wed...had the meeting this past Monday...not one Lawyer..who advertises real estate law or easements had an interest in this....probally a lose lose..not worth the money type thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah every lawyer in Columbia(The fricking capital) put me off on someone else. I could not find anyone as I booted them off my property last wed...had the meeting this past Monday...not one Lawyer..who advertises real estate law or easements had an interest in this....probally a lose lose..not worth the money type thing.

 

Ah you already went the lawyer route.

 

Man I think you are fugged.

 

Last ditch effort. See if WLTX or anyone has one of those whistle blowers segments. They will not want to deal with it but if you are the guy sitting out front of his house in a chaise lounge with a shotgun you will get some pub.

 

And then the lawyers will be flocking to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah you already went the lawyer route.

Man I think you are fugged.

Last ditch effort. See if WLTX or anyone has one of those whistle blowers segments. They will not want to deal with it but if you are the guy sitting out front of his house in a chaise lounge with a shotgun you will get some pub.

And then the lawyers will be flocking to you.

Que dressing like a ninja montage...its on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easement is there so it is why I am apprehensive. Seems like when they are leaving behing a lovley concrete drain with a manhole cover in my backyard I should be able to recoup some marginal loss of property value...or stop this crap...they should start digging tommorow. Whoohoo!!

I am pretty sure this is some NSA stake out bc I pied one of Venom's posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your closing docs should have had a survey map in there, and the easement should have been noted on that survey.  Check and if it was marked when you closed, then you're screwed.  You can however try and get them to plant shrubs, etc around it to try and hide it from view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were you, I would make sure the easement is either on your survey map or described in the deed for your property.  If it is I would make damn sure that they kept whatever work inside of that easement.  Unfortunately there is probably not a whole lot you can do to stop it as there is apparently an easement not to mention they can probably use eminent domain.  Usually there are town planning meetings to discuss such projects.  I would plan on attending the next one and voicing your displeasure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...