Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any stock savvy posters?


Kettle

Recommended Posts

when your company gives you RSUs, which I'm assuming this is, they pay the taxes at the time of the disbursement. people usually just sell them right away. might as well cash them in on the same tax year as your pay out for easier record keeping.

ESPP is different, though, as you don't pay taxes when you receive or sell the shares. you pay taxes on those dependent on how long you held them before cashing in. usually best to hold onto those for at least a couple of years.

if the company is doing well, is solid and you don't need the money, holding them will be good in the long run (10+ years). but even a company like apple goes up and down year in and year out. if you're not planning to hold them for retirement, then just cash in now. look at Microsoft, for example. they seemed like a sure money maker for a couple of decades, now they are a money incinerator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In short, I recently was gifted some shares by my employer.  These contribute to my annual gross income.  I've heard the market will fall depending on the government shutdown.  Is it wise to sell, or should I hold on?

 

I would treat them like any other investment. How does it fit into your current portfolio? Is it large enough that you are not diversified? What is the long-term outlook for your company? What does it do to your taxes? Do you want long term results or are you looking to turn it into cash as soon as possible? Does it pay a dividend?

 

Also do you need to sell to cover the tax impact?

 

The government shutdown is a short-term trend. For holding stocks I would want to know what the long-term outlook is (which i have no clue)?

 

Anyway I inherited a few physical shares of a stock around 5 years ago and I stuffed them in my safe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buy on bad news (which is the shutdown news) and sell on good.

You need to know the rules of your stocks. Each company could have certsin specfics. But you have sold already.

Also you said they gifted them to you? Family biz?

Check with CPA type to make sure you don't miss anything tax or cost basis related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...