Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who covers Jimmy Graham?


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

White or Dockery.  We don't have anyone that's as good as Talib, but those two are probably our best bets.  Maybe even double him usually having Lester help out.  They don't have any other scary receivers.  Colston is good, but he's far from elite.  Thomas should be able to handle him for the most part.  Sproles is dangerous, but not as a wideout.  As a receiver, he's mostly the responsibility of the LBs and DEs.  The Patriots don't have anyone else in the secondary that's any good and they were able to limit the rest of NO's receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy and Johnson. Create enough havoc in the backfield and we could have Grimace covering him and it won't matter.  But if you gotta put a physical body on him, might have to go with Mr White.  Atleast jam him at the line.  Thankfully, we don't have to worry about him until very late in the season so a lot can change between now and then...except that the Jaguars will still be awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • 3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...