-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
Posts
-
Can i just say I'm excited about this game in a way I haven't been for years.... I think it's going to be a fight all the way through. Bengals are a good team with a killer offense that everyone knows shouldn't be looking for their first win and you know they've got to be hungry. But I think we're a pack of hungry dawgs who just got a taste for blood and want some more. More than that, I think they love their coach and their big red dawg and will fight extra hard not to disappoint them. I think they've pulled together as a pack and won't back down. Will we win? I sure hope so and I think we've got an excellent chance. But, win or lose, I think we've got a fight and pride in us that hasn't been here in a long time. Let's fuggin go.
-
This post literally proves what I've been saying about him and what you seem to just gloss over and ignore while saying it's a feather into his cap for his draft status. Him being a 2 way player has ZERO standing on his NFL draft prospects, as he will NOT be a full time 2 way player in the NFL, if that was even reasonably feasible, it would change things, but it's not. If he enters the draft as a CB, then sure, it gives him a slight boost because a team could look at him as someone they could give 10-15 snaps on offense a game as a gadget player. But his college 2 way game has less than zero impact on his NFL draft prospects as a full time WR. You can't seem to separate college impact from NFL draft prospects, they're literally 2 entirely different things, and if you can't acknowledge or understand that, then this conversation is just absurdly pointless anyways. And the comparisons have nothing to do with their game itself, just impact at each level. The Bush comparison is about his college vs NFL impact. Bush was a complete generational collegiate talent, there's been few like him with how he could take over a game, but he was just a solid NFL player with moments of greatness. Woodson was a generational collegiate talent who also could take over games, in a manner much more similar to Hunter, but his game translated to being a 1st baller HOFer. Which is why I say he's more Bush than Woodson, both game changers in college, but only one was also a generational NFL talent in the end. And again I have to clarify, none of this is saying he's going to be a bust or not even a 1st round talent. It's all as to why I rank him below TWO players in the draft next year if he were to decide to play WR. But you seem to think I'm saying he shouldn't be going until the 5th round or something with how you think I attack him.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.