Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason traded?

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Where did I say he played for Bama? 

 

the knock on some of these 'Bama/LSU players has sometimes been that when they reach Bama and play there for 3-4 years they have already peaked and hit their ceiling. There isn't much room to grow in the NFL and get better. 

 

Honestly, out of the dominating teams Bama has produced since Saban got there, who is currently the best player in the NFL from there? 

 

Julio Jones?

Hightower? 

 

LSU 

 

PP?

 

 

Before you got called out on it (and edited it), the first sentence read "the knock on some of these Bama players"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers90 Newbie

panthers90

Posted
Posted

Damn, finally made it to page 52!

 

My 2 thoughts:

1. All of you saying this is so disrespectful to Beason for all he did for us, etc. I think we are doing the exact opposite. Letting him go compete for a starting MLB job- a player of Beason's heart and desire shouldn't be on the bench. 

2. That Klein (Kuechly 2.0) pick is looking even better now.

 

edit: and it would be badass if we stopped (or locked) the thread at 52

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

If I'm not upset about it non of u fuggers should be.

I doubt Jon is upset either. That guy is the forever optimist.

You should make your own thread with your thoughts and pin it. You know, to prevent like 50 appreciation threads from people trying to rack up pie by creating "their own"

Or you know, you can do whatever u want since u own this place

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaggasaurus Community Regular

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted

I agree. And both have been NFL SCRUBS. Which goes back to my post in that thread.

 

 I made a comment about Bama players and people take what they want out of context and read what they want. I am responsible for what I say, not what you comprehend. 

I would take Claiborne....you just need to dumb it down real good for him... Allow him to only cover one guy the whole game, bump and run... no need to think.. Dre K could care 2 fugs about playing football, he is paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

If I'm not upset about it non of u fuggers should be.

I doubt Jon is upset either. That guy is the forever optimist.

 

He may be an optimist but Thomas Davis and Brandon LaFell don't seem to be sharing the same feelings...

 

Obviously those guys recognize the business aspect of the NFL more than we ever will, but to see players get upset after seeing a fellow teammate get cut/traded is always a little discouraging because you wonder how it will affect them and the team morale.

 

I know a lot of people like to down play the morale aspect but assuming that you get to visit the locker rooms after games (I think), you can vouch for how the players act/feel/talk etc... after a huge win (vs. the Giants) or a disheartening loss (@ the Bills).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

He may be an optimist but Thomas Davis and Brandon LaFell don't seem to be sharing the same feelings...

 

Are they whining about it on twitter? I'm surprised anyone can read LaFell's tweets. #OOHHWEEMAYNE

 

If everyone on the team is that upset about trading a guy who has played in 8 games since signing a mega contract 3 years ago....I dunno man. Makes me think we are in for a LOSS on Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Semaj Newbie

Semaj

Posted
Posted

Beason sucked....but trading away a leader and respected guy for a 7th rounder just sucks. Better IMO to of parted ways with Beason in an offseason....if we weren't getting a real benefit from it. Seems more like DG doing old buds a favor

I agree 100 percent. That is why I don't like it.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...