Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tannehill or Roethlisberger?

Growl

By Growl,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted

Cam is my starter and obviously as you all know on a Bye. Headed into a big matchup this week to hold onto 1st place in my division against the guy in 2nd. Ben is already on my roster, but Tannehill is tempting to make a move for and would dictate I cut Ben to do him (rest of my roster is too good to part with anybody else). Hard to bench Ben though after he put up the monster game Sunday night and had a good fantasy game the week before. PPR league, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Ward 1, Hunter, maybe 2. Per McShay

      By MHS831 · Posted

      They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • KillerKat
      Playoff bound. Again.

      By KillerKat · Posted

      I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • TD alt
      DONOVAN EZEIRUAKU at 8?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...