Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sooooo.... DeAngelo Williams......


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

We need to spend less money on the run game....bottom line.

Name the RB in Green Bay right now?

I was hard on Williams last year as a runner (that was separate than the contract debacle rants).....he is simply running better this year and he isn't getting much help. He is earning those.....OL still leaving a lot to be desired

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the majority of this fan base understands DWill  is a good RB plain and simple.  It was the read option and read option alone that made him look bad recently, and ...what a coincidence, we do away with the bullshit, and he comes out looking good again...  Is he over paid?  yes...  should he be traded?  not be any means.  carry on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to spend less money on the run game....bottom line.

Name the RB in Green Bay right now?

I was hard on Williams last year as a runner (that was separate than the contract debacle rants).....he is simply running better this year and he isn't getting much help. He is earning those.....OL still leaving a lot to be desired

 

soooo you were wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, at this point there are much larger wastes of money on our roster. Stewart has, by far, been a bigger waste of his large contract to this point. Godfrey and Beason are similar wastes of money currently. 

 

I'm not justifying his paycheck, because no team should ever pay a running back that sort of check, especially one that they consider a "split duty" back (though he's a featured back presently), but there's worse waste on the payroll at present. Remember more of Stewarts contract was guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
    • Clearly the best outcome for us is a Giants W. A spot or two difference in the 4th round is inconsequential. Just look at the trade value charts. A spot or two at the top of the 1st means a LOT. A spot or two in the mid-rounds? Virtually nothing.
    • Agree. I don't think I have ever heard him say anything positive, at any time, about the Panthers. Best expectation is no mention at all.
×
×
  • Create New...