Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You wanna know why we won't sign Kerry Rhodes? :/


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

"Hate the sin, love the sinner."

 

Sounds to me like Smitty is leaving out the second part because it makes him uncomfortable.  His Lord and Savior didn't think he was too good to associate with prostitutes, tax collectors, thieves, lepers, etc.  Lots of Christians choose to intentionally overlook that point.

 

jesus christ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take a guess

 

Ok I will

 

Someone ask Steve Smith if Kerry was gay, and he said, "I don't know, we don't run in the same circles". 

 

You posted a comment that someone else said they heard or read Smith say.  We are getting the comment third hand (and thats being generous), so until we can see what was actually said, we can all make up our guesses as to what that meant, if it was actually said in the first place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well... Do you think he was lying? He said he heard it on the radio.. Not like he pulled it out of his ass

Well he claims Smitty said it on the radio....so it should be easy to verify. Probably makes it true as well

I'll hear it for myself then before I jump to conclusions on something likely out of context.

People give Joe Person poo, but Dator is a whole different level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with winning or losing.

When will people learn to comprehend? Jesus lol

along those lines, I've stated before that I have found it better on the huddle to assume that everyone is a complete idiot till proven otherwise.  Unfortunate that this is needed but true.

 

You tend to look at the good post and go "oh thats a good point" or "I see the other side to this argument" and with the average posts on here just scroll over them and go yeah.... nothing to see here same old same old.... seems like the stupid just bothers you less when you do that.

 

only time I ever respond is when someone actually makes a good point, or if they say something so mind boggling stupid that it's worth a flaming or two just to make everything right in the world again case in point: last week when I flamed the guy that made a thread about us not going for it on 4th and inches when we were on our own 34 with the lead and the game not on the line. it's just a different level of stupid that goes around here from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure why smith's view, if it is true, is disappointing.

until teams/nfl makes accomodations for both sides for locker room etiquette, it would be very uncomfortable for someone who isn't gay to undress in front of someone who is.

 

i've had gay teammates. its not a big deal unless you make it one. and those that do usually have insecurities. thats on them, not the gay dude who is just trying to get home to his friends and family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...