Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You missing Chud yet?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Chud didn't have a issue scoring last year. this year the defense is not the problem.

 

 

Actually, we did have scoring issues last year, especially early in the season.  Ten points against Tampa, atrocious peformances against Seattle, Dallas, and the Giants.   Except for one decent game against the Falcons, and our game against the worst defense in the history of the NFL (the Saints) our early season offense was very bad last year. It only got better once the season was for all intents and purposes over.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy not running Trent Richardson and turning it into the Weeden show? That Chud?

 

They are a lose lose situation.  Richardson isnt talented enough to have an offence centered around in todays passing NFL.  The same can be said about Weeden.  Lose lose.

 

Hopefully Gordon kicks ass for my fantasy team though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FU(K NO! But, I sure as hell miss this guy:

 

JohnFox_zpsd252e3f7.jpg

 

It just comes to show how important that decision is to a team.  The coach is paramount to a team's success more than any particular player on a squad in the NFL.  We probably have one of the worst coaching staff's in the league (bottom-3).  Jerry made a very poor choice to start out Cam's career and build with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are a lose lose situation. Richardson isnt talented enough to have an offence centered around in todays passing NFL. The same can be said about Weeden. Lose lose.

Hopefully Gordon kicks ass for my fantasy team though.

I am not talking about treating him like his is Peterson. They simply don't use him in close games and go all Weeden for absurd periods of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think chud Offensive mind is greatly missed this year.  It's safe to say cam's early success rested on the shoulders of chud's play calling and understanding of this system. Most of us wrote him off seeing as how much read option he ran and prayed for a more white bread offense. Well here you have it.I think if all we needed was 21 points to deliver both of these wins chud delivers.

miss him hell I thought he was calling the plays for a while today (deep pass, deep pass, deep pass, punt)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...