Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You missing Chud yet?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Chud didn't have a issue scoring last year. this year the defense is not the problem.

 

 

Actually, we did have scoring issues last year, especially early in the season.  Ten points against Tampa, atrocious peformances against Seattle, Dallas, and the Giants.   Except for one decent game against the Falcons, and our game against the worst defense in the history of the NFL (the Saints) our early season offense was very bad last year. It only got better once the season was for all intents and purposes over.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy not running Trent Richardson and turning it into the Weeden show? That Chud?

 

They are a lose lose situation.  Richardson isnt talented enough to have an offence centered around in todays passing NFL.  The same can be said about Weeden.  Lose lose.

 

Hopefully Gordon kicks ass for my fantasy team though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FU(K NO! But, I sure as hell miss this guy:

 

JohnFox_zpsd252e3f7.jpg

 

It just comes to show how important that decision is to a team.  The coach is paramount to a team's success more than any particular player on a squad in the NFL.  We probably have one of the worst coaching staff's in the league (bottom-3).  Jerry made a very poor choice to start out Cam's career and build with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are a lose lose situation. Richardson isnt talented enough to have an offence centered around in todays passing NFL. The same can be said about Weeden. Lose lose.

Hopefully Gordon kicks ass for my fantasy team though.

I am not talking about treating him like his is Peterson. They simply don't use him in close games and go all Weeden for absurd periods of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think chud Offensive mind is greatly missed this year.  It's safe to say cam's early success rested on the shoulders of chud's play calling and understanding of this system. Most of us wrote him off seeing as how much read option he ran and prayed for a more white bread offense. Well here you have it.I think if all we needed was 21 points to deliver both of these wins chud delivers.

miss him hell I thought he was calling the plays for a while today (deep pass, deep pass, deep pass, punt)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...