Ranking the Young QB's According to ESPN

[Herbert The Love Bug]

How many om that list were rookie of the year?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[thennek]

Once the Panthers start winning, these rankings will change.  It's all about winning games, and Cam will unfairly be judged until the Panthers losing ways change.

[CRA]

What a shameless gutless article. How the fug can they have the slightest idea into Cam's intelligence? Because of post game interviews? I'm tired of this borderline racist poo man. Cam's asked to do more than of these guys and physically superior and more durable than all of them. Sheer idiocy.

I'd exclude Luck from that...he was asked to make a lot of throws consistantly.

RG and Kap weren't asked to consistantly make tough throws each week

[MuMouey]

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

[Darth Biscuit]

I stopped at Durability.  Stupid list.

[CAPantherFan]

These things will never change until the Panthers can win some games. Why would they?

Exactly.  Until we start winning some games we will get NO respect.  And we shouldn't.   

 

Gman said it - it's time to start winning Cam....

[Jesse]

It's an ESPN ranking. Nothing to see here...

[thefuzz]

I like the unnamed random AFC QB coach.....claiming Cam is a me first player at heart. pretty sure no AFC QB coach has ever worked with Newton....

 

Wonder if they meant Chud, but were trying to label him as QB guru?

 

Don't know, just wondering.

 

That said, this is all tied to winning.  

[C47]

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

 

That's an awful example.  The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Nobody actually goes in and assigns man and zone coverage ratings for every single Offensive Lineman.  Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

[MuMouey]

Exactly. Until we start winning some games we will get NO respect. And we shouldn't.

Gman said it - it's time to start winning Cam....

Completely agree for the most part. But "Panthers arent winning so that means Cam's not... durable....?"

Such a dumb list. But then again, its getting 10,000's of clicks from pissed off fans. So i guess their plan worked

[CanadianCat]

At this point I agree with that list

 

I dont care if Newton has all the ability in the world, until he finds us a way to win I would rank these other guys higher. If rankings were based on ability then J Russell would (and was) the best QB the NFL may have ever seen, but its not about ability - its about the ability to find a way to win and these other guys have.

 

It doesn't matter if it a 'team' game, that ship has sailed..

 

Once the Panthers start winning, these rankings will change.  It's all about winning games, and Cam will unfairly be judged until the Panthers losing ways change.

 

[MuMouey]

That's an awful example. The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

[Cary Kollins]

this is my angry face

[C47]

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

 

You don't understand how coding works do you? They set a range and it assigns an arbitrary number for useless ratings by position.  As in no human ever touches the thing.  As in they give it no thought whatsoever they just let the computer assign a number.  Really not that difficult....