For those who say our game plan didn't work

[frash.exe]

Guys look how smart I am here I'll prove it

Me: here is some awesome groundbreaking analysis

Them: derp hurr IMA retarddd

See guys?

[Happy Panther]

looks like lafell got open on that 3rd and 2

 Lafell was open several times.

[Growl]

Offensive possessions matter. We had 3 in the 2nd half....Philly for example had 5 in the first quarter.

You want more attempts then the O needs the ball more

 

We held the ball for thirty minutes of clock and came out with a pitiful 49 snaps, by my tally.

 

By comparison, New Orleans had six less minutes of possession time and put up 64 snaps and way more points.

 

Chicago had one more minute of clock control than us and came out with 61 snaps. The worthless Jets had two minutes more and had 68 snaps. The Bill's had a whopping 8 minutes less than us and yet still put up 61 snaps.

 

If I wanted to get into the teams who had five or six minutes more TOP, we'd be talking about teams with snaps counts in the 70's and 80's.

 

All these teams had way more points.

[Sod]

We lost, therefore game plan didnt work. Simple and plain.

[MuMouey]

We held the ball for thirty minutes of clock and came out with a pitiful 49 snaps, by my tally.

 

By comparison, New Orleans had six less minutes of possession time and put up 64 snaps and way more points.

 

Chicago had one more minute of clock control than us and came out with 61 snaps. The worthless Jets had two minutes more and had 68 snaps. The Bill's had a whopping 8 minutes less than us and yet still put up 61 snaps.

 

If I wanted to get into the teams who had five or six minutes more TOP, we'd be talking about teams with snaps counts in the 70's and 80's.

 

this is going to be tough kid, but ill try and explain football to you. 

 

1) when playing against the best secondary in the NFL (especially with the shitty receivers we have), it's wise not to try and throw the ball 45 times. it can only lead to bad things.

2) Seattle's D Line was very banged up so we attacked it

3) we averaged over 5 yards per carry

4) You do realize part of the gameplan was keeping Seattle's offense OFF the field right?

 

... forget it. You clearly know better then the guys dedicating their entire lives to coordinating and playcalling. It's so weird how your phone hasn't rang yet with a call from JR. I'm sure it will be any minute now.

 

So for the 4th time, I ask all the dumb people on here:

1) If Olsen's drops, DWill's fumble, and Cam's bad throw DIDN'T effect our offense stalling, please jump in and tell me what did 

2) and also, you guys seemed to get real quiet when I used your own retarded logic against you. Seattle is the 4th worst team in the NFL right? Cuz they only scored 12 points....

 

please go on and avoid all my questions cuz you have no real answers . Ill be here waiting :)

[Delhommey]

this is going to be tough kid, but ill try and explain football to you. 

 

1) when playing against the best secondary in the NFL (especially with the shitty receivers we have), it's wise not to try and throw the ball 45 times. it can only lead to bad things.

2) Seattle's D Line was very banged up so we attacked it

3) we averaged over 5 yards per carry

4) You do realize part of the gameplan was keeping Seattle's offense OFF the field right?

 

... forget it. You clearly know better then the guys dedicating their entire lives to coordinating and playcalling. It's so weird how your phone hasn't rang yet with a call from JR. I'm sure it will be any minute now.

 

So for the 4th time, I ask all the dumb people on here:

1) If Olsen's drops, DWill's fumble, and Cam's bad throw DIDN'T effect our offense stalling, please jump in and tell me what did 

2) and also, you guys seemed to get real quiet when I used your own retarded logic against you. Seattle is the 4th worst team in the NFL right? Cuz they only scored 12 points....

 

please go on and avoid all my questions cuz you have no real answers . Ill be here waiting :)

 

Our silence is more in regards to knowing better than to engage the confidently ignorant

 

[MuMouey]

Our silence is more in regards to knowing better than to engage the confidently ignorant

 

 

Funny how it works out EXACTLY as I stated. No one has any answers. Too easy.

[Growl]

this is going to be tough kid, but ill try and explain football to you. 

 

1) when playing against the best secondary in the NFL (especially with the shitty receivers we have), it's wise not to try and throw the ball 45 times. it can only lead to bad things.

2) Seattle's D Line was very banged up so we attacked it

3) we averaged over 5 yards per carry

4) You do realize part of the gameplan was keeping Seattle's offense OFF the field right?

 

... forget it. You clearly know better then the guys dedicating their entire lives to coordinating and playcalling. It's so weird how your phone hasn't rang yet with a call from JR. I'm sure it will be any minute now.

 

So for the 4th time, I ask all the dumb people on here:

1) If Olsen's drops, DWill's fumble, and Cam's bad throw DIDN'T effect our offense stalling, please jump in and tell me what did 

2) and also, you guys seemed to get real quiet when I used your own retarded logic against you. Seattle is the 4th worst team in the NFL right? Cuz they only scored 12 points....

 

please go on and avoid all my questions cuz you have no real answers . Ill be here waiting :)

 

I'm sorry are you speaking to me or to yourself again?

 

alright I'll try to explain this to you one last time as it has been reiterated a number of times and you don't seem willing to accept it, preferring instead to wallow in your ignorance.

 

the grand point here, the reason I even posted the aforementioned information is to illustrate how idiotic predictable playcalling effectively ended any hope we had of scoring. your defense is the same tired argument you've made since creating this thread, that a couple of miscues scattered throughout the game is what really did us in, but as has been explained to you by numerous posters within the the context of this very thread, an intelligent gameplan can overcome such miscues. There is never, ever, ever any excuse for only having a 7 points in a game. Even if Deangelo doesn't fumble and we score, we have 14 total points which would be good for about a 4-12 record in the modern NFL. Attributing such a low offensive output to a handful of plays is absolute idiocy.

 

 

:) :) :) :) :) :)

[frash.exe]

Once again I ask you guys why water is wet.

Oh you can't answer me? Well then you are a bunch of dopes I knew it. I told you that you couldn't prove that to me and you didn't

[TheRed]

Good analysis.

 

Same people shitting all over the place in this thread. It may be time to give the huddle a break until Sunday.

[MuMouey]

I'm sorry are you speaking to me or to yourself again?

 

alright I'll try to explain this to you one last time as it has been reiterated a number of times and you don't seem willing to accept it, preferring instead to wallow in your ignorance.

 

the grand point here, the reason I even posted the aforementioned information is to illustrate how idiotic predictable playcalling effectively ended any hope we had of scoring. your defense is the same tired argument you've made since creating this thread, that a couple of miscues scattered throughout the game is what really did us in, but as has been explained to you by numerous posters within the the context of this very thread, an intelligent gameplan can overcome such miscues. There is never, ever, ever any excuse for only having a 7 points in a game. Even if Deangelo doesn't fumble and we score, we have 14 total points which would be good for about a 4-12 record in the modern NFL. Attributing such a low offensive output to a handful of plays is absolute idiocy.

 

 

:) :) :) :) :) :)

 

 

LMAO. you are too much. please tell me more about how our game plan for THIS game is the EXACT same gameplan we will have in every game going forward. Tell me about how we will run the exact same plays in the exact same situations. And I'll ask for a 5th time (again, not expecting any answers from idiots here), but u said if we scored 14 points we are going 4-12, Seattle scoring 12 points means they finish what? 3-13? Some more wonderfully retarded logic from the Carolina Huddle.

 

and no, if DWill doesn't fumble, we aren't 4-12, we're 1-0

[Shufdog]

Good analysis.

 

Same people shitting all over the place in this thread. It may be time to give the huddle a break until Sunday.

 

Yep! :phew:

[C47]

It's not a good analysis though because teams all over the NFL deal with just as many miscues and mistakes, yet still manage to put up more than seven or even 14 points.  Please stop with the Seattle is the best defense in NFL bullshit, they were missing a top 15 corner and three other impact players on Defense including two of their best pass rushers.  We didn't play the same Seahawks team that people are trumpeting last years stats from, so don't try and act like we did....

[MuMouey]

Other than 2 throws (which are included here), I don't see where you're getting the semi-accurate theory from. Cam was quite accurate from the pocket on Sunday (would have completed 76% of his passes had Olsen not dropped those gifts).

 

didn't mean just in sundays game. I was generally referring more to the 32 games he played before that. Never said he was bad, just that it's something he could work on