Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4th and inches


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

I doubt that many people would bitch about rivera going for the 4th and inches and not getting it.. it would finally show us that he does indeed has some balls.

 

BS.  Losing a game to appease fans would have been the dumbest thing he has ever done as a coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I and many on here don't see it that way.. to me not going for it on 4th and inches when you have one of the best centers in football and a pretty big QB just screams I give up lets punt it away even though we have very very good odds of making it.. come on man.

if many is 3-4 it still doesnt make you right, Teeray's point about being already in field goal range and giving up the lead is all you need to know about that, it's just fact you dont go for it there. if your brain and your so called "many on here" can't comprehend that it's not my fault.

 

honestly I'm serious thinking that this is just a generational issue here, thinking it should work because it works in madden. seen it before and I guess I'm seeing it again.

 

nobody goes for it while they are in the lead on their own 34 yard line, I dont care what your imagination says the other coaches would have done, they wouldnt have because they know better unlike you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the D was dominating the game why would you give a team the ball in scoring position with a 1 point lead?

 

Wouldn't you want them to try to put together a drive against that D that is dominating?

 

It would have been the dumbest call in the history of coaching (maybe an exaggeration).  If we got it, maybe no one cares.  but if we get stuffed, they kick a field goal and we lose by 2 despite our defense dominating the same people would be in here bitching about going for it, or more likely would try to blame it on the playcall and not the fact we would have made a dumbass decision

 

 

 

I understand your logic and I agree with you to a certain extent. On the other hand, Rivera and this team are now 13-20 in games decided by 7 points or less. I understand not wanting to give the Seahawks the ball in scoring position, but at some point you have to realize that what you are doing clearly isn't working. And Rivera clearly has been making decisions not to lose, instead of winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's playing the percentages and it's smart football.  Say it's a 75% chance we pick up the first down.  The best case in that single instance is we get a first down.  On that same note it's a 25% chance we don't make it, then the best case in that instance is we only give up a field goal.  

 

If you understand math at all you'll see why we did not go for it.  

 

Even though the percentage of success is higher in going for it the downside of not getting it is much, much worse.  

 

Think of it like this.  If you punt it's a 100% chance they don't kick a field goal right there.  If you go for it there is a 25% chance they get 3 easy points.  With a ton of time left, you deep in your own side of the field and you defense it playing lights out.   Why the hell would you take a chance in a close game to give points away just for the chance to get one 1st down?

 

Statistics say don't do it.  Smart NFL coaches say don't do it.  Common sense says don't do it.  

 

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

 

Read that again for the logically challenged among us.

 

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that many people would bitch about rivera going for the 4th and inches and not getting it.. it would finally show us that he does indeed has some balls.

and there you go and go full retard, that level of stupidity cannot be reasoned with I'm out of here because this is clearly a waste of time.

 

hey Delhommey this is the moron you're siding with maybe you need to rethink your compatriots, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and there you go and go full retard, that level of stupidity cannot be reasoned with I'm out of here because this is clearly a waste of time.

hey Delhommey this is the moron you're siding with maybe you need to rethink your compatriots, lol.

There's a lot of "morons" on Twitter that spend a lot of time analyzing football that think the same thing if we're going that route.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doc holiday all you have done in this thread is insult me.. grow up or gtfo.

no I insulted you, pointed out the extreme flaw in your argument and insulted you again.

 

now you are just asking me to go away, you're the one that needs to grow up. think your argument is better then mine come up with a better counter argument, because I've buried you without even needing to put any effort into it.  weak sauce is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could at least line up and try to draw the team offsides with a hard count one day....we are so predictable

Sent from my Motorola Galaxy s3 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

And if it doesn't work waste a timeout in the second half of a close game??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's playing the percentages and it's smart football.  Say it's a 75% chance we pick up the first down.  The best case in that single instance is we get a first down.  On that same note it's a 25% chance we don't make it, then the best case in that instance is we only give up a field goal.  

 

If you understand math at all you'll see why we did not go for it.  

 

Even though the percentage of success is higher in going for it the downside of not getting it is much, much worse.  

 

Think of it like this.  If you punt it's a 100% chance they don't kick a field goal right there.  If you go for it there is a 25% chance they get 3 easy points.  With a ton of time left, you deep in your own side of the field and you defense it playing lights out.   Why the hell would you take a chance in a close game to give points away just for the chance to get one 1st down?

 

Statistics say don't do it.  Smart NFL coaches say don't do it.  Common sense says don't do it.  

 

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

 

Read that again for the logically challenged among us.

 

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

The benefits do not outweigh the risk.

 

That's correct and any analytical analysis on this, at least that I have read, says that going for it on 4th and 1 on your own 34 has a negative expected points added.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...