Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Lafell targeted at all in this game?


pstall

Recommended Posts

As usual, any receivers not named Steve Smith were nowhere to be found. The guy we signed to come in for the #3 receiver spot still can't get on the field. Olsen with his drive killing drops early on. No wonder we lost.

I'm still baffled that we kept Armond Smith over Tauren Poole. I didn't like it then, and I hate it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn't call Ginn for a deep post or anything either...

 

We did NOTHING to stretch the field.

 

Yea, I'm not sure what's up with that. Either they didn't think Cam would have the time for it to setup or they didn't trust there would be no Int. Was there even an attempt at a pass more than 20 yards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell is not the answer. Carolina fans really needs to quit riding this dude's balls. I've said it the first time he stepped on the field and I'm still saying it now. The man cannot create separation.

 

 

Thats blasphemy on the huddle

 

You cant call out lafell without getting screamed at about how he is a great #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...