Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodbye David Gettis


Zod

Recommended Posts

Another thing to keep in mind is that Olsen is the #2 option on this team. Lafell is really a #3. You add in Hixon and Ginn and Even Edwards that were above him and he wasn't going to see many snaps even if he made the team.

I swear that this dude is the Real Cam Newton!

Just the way he says things...

Go ahead and laugh at me now, but I'm being for real serious. His insights are just too on point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not being melodramatic, just real. I don't think our receiving corps hinged upon Gettis, but he sure added a lot of good value and depth to the position.  I mean, I don't want to rely on Armanti or Hixon if we have an injury.  At least I could half way feel some hope with Ginn, Gettis and LaFell. Now if we have an injury, I am going to be thinking that we will be lucky just to hold serve.  I have heard all the preseason hype before, but I've also seen the reality when you get right down to it, and AE and Hixon (and all of them, save for Smitty, really) are going to show a whole helluva lot more than they have for our pass offense to not revert back to the broken-winged bird that it has been, and it will do so in a hurry if Smith were to be out any appreciable amount of time (and any time, really, with such small win-loss margins to earn a playoff berth).  Gettis has that rare combination of size, speed, and the ability to catch that can keep defenses honest and even off balance.  He was the X-factor that could make people pay for taken him for granted. 

 

I just got through talking with a Skins fan up here in D.C. before I got on here to get the final results, and he was talking about our need to get Cam some offensive weapons (including guards to keep him upright) and I came down to this.  SMDH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear that this dude is the Real Cam Newton!

Just the way he says things...

Go ahead and laugh at me now, but I'm being for real serious. His insights are just too on point

I appreciate being compared to the great Cam Newton but I assure you I'm not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not being melodramatic, just real. I don't think our receiving corps hinged upon Gettis, but he sure added a lot of good value and depth to the position.  I mean, I don't want to rely on Armanti or Hixon if we have an injury.  At least I could half way feel some hope with Ginn, Gettis and LaFell. Now if we have an injury, I am going to be thinking that we will be lucky just to hold serve.  I have heard all the preseason hype before, but I've also seen the reality when you get right down to it, and AE and Hixon (and all of them, save for Smitty, really) are going to show a whole helluva lot more than they have for our pass offense to not revert back to the broken-winged bird that it has been, and it will do so in a hurry if Smith were to be out any appreciable amount of time (and any time, really, with such small win-loss margins to earn a playoff berth).  Gettis has that rare combination of size, speed, and the ability to catch that can keep defenses honest and even off balance.  He was the X-factor that could make people pay for taken him for granted. 

 

I just got through talking with a Skins fan up here in D.C. before I got on here to get the final results, and he was talking about our need to get Cam some offensive weapons (including guards to keep him upright) and I came down to this.  SMDH.

 

The injury you refer to would most likely be Gettis based on his history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear that this dude is the Real Cam Newton!

Just the way he says things...

Go ahead and laugh at me now, but I'm being for real serious. His insights are just too on point

 

I can neither confirm nor deny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sorry man, but this post is hilarious.

 

Well, plenty of people including this Skins fan thinks that our inability to protect Cam and give him some weapons is hilarious also, and then we take one of them away in lieu of some guys that many Panthers fans have never even heard of.  

 

OK. We'll see how it goes, but don't fail to recognize the humor in the situation when our passing game suffers at the first sign of injury,  just plain mediocrity, and/or lack of execution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armanti "Teflon" Edwards, lives to ride another day. Lmfao@ someone saying he can play special teams. Hell, I can "play" chess...just not very well.

Heeeeeyyyyy, more random hate for Armanti. We certainly don't get enough of that around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry guys, when I look at our WR depth now, without Gettis it looks like a whole bunch of smoke and mirrors.

You are giving Gettis way too much credit.

3 passes in 2010 created a legend that kept growing despite him never doing anything beyond it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...