Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting tidbit on Beason's restructure...FA at end of the Season?


Kurb

Recommended Posts

So Scott Fouler wrote some crappy article about Beason being healthy all season, then one of the guys I follow on twitter had this to say:

 

 

  1. @josephperson @scott_fowler Beason could use a bounce back year because his deal voids on the 5th day of the '14 waiver period (2/7/14).

     
  2. @corryjoel was this a part of his restructure? does he become an FA? no one has mentioned this

     
  3. @StevenFeezor Beason's deal voiding after the season was a part of his pay cut. The Panthers will pick up $2.5M in cap room w/the voiding.

 

 

  1.  
  2. @corryjoel So this is Beas becomes a FA after this season?

     
  3. @StevenFeezor Beason will be an unrestricted free agent after the season.

     
     
     
     
    10:01 AM - 20 Aug 13 · Details

 

 

Fascinating.

 

Beason a FA at the end of the Season?

I missed that somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman's cleaning up of troublesome contracts has been impressive.

I love me some Beason, but the situation has changed drastically from when he first signed his deal. 

In a perfect world he could return at a reduced rate, but I understand doing what's best for you as a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think he wants to play mike if he gets back to form. he would more than likely sign with another team if he does.

i wouldn't blame him for it and i wouldn't have a problem with it either. he's a class act and we'd still be good there without him.

 

i mean we'd be better with him but still fine without.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...