Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football play ideas


tarheelfan23

Recommended Posts

me and rhyslloyd were playing some madden the other night, and I had the bright idea to put AE in the back field as a RB....and i know yall are going to say he is too small to play RB. But just listen me out.  We ran a couple of running plays and got some decent yardage...then I decided with AE quarterbacking background hey lets run a toss pass deep to Gettis (who now has his speed back and his swag back in preseason) BOOOOOOOOOOM 80 yard TD easy.  Why dont we try something like this......Even have Cam and AE in back field together and motion Cam out wide....mismatch all day......this game is all about mismatches, we need to make some and putting AE in backfield can produce this in many ways.

 

What yall think?  I will post my video TD of AE throwing to Gettis soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the classic, "i thought i had a good idea, but they made fun of me for it so i did an about face and pretended it was a joke the whole time" .

yea your right man...im scared of you and your carpal tunnel wrists for being a internet bully......you got me bro u got me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...