Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let the overreaction Begin.


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

Remember when the jets couldn't score a td in the preseason and everyone says its just preseason? There isn't some switch you can just turn on. The sky isn't falling by any means but you damn sure better be concerned that our offense hasn't had a td drive thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense but this happens every preseason...and I make the same argument every preseason.

 

It's JUST as annoying when people overreact about the preseason than when people DONT react to the preseason.

 

Anybody who watched the game tonight and mutters to themselves that "it's just preseason" hasn't been watching this team for the last two-three years.  The same problems keep coming up...Not sharp or disciplined.  Cam over throwing receivers and trying to do everything.  Poor adjustments on defense.  Poor redzone and third down efficiency. 

 

Is it the end of the world and is the sky falling?  No.  Does this game make me feel any better about the problems this team continues to have? No.

 

I say let the people overreact and let the people under react.  And let the sane people in the middle worried about the actual problems and be happy about the actual strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...