Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great Grantland article on future of Cats


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9562293/al-jefferson-michael-kidd-gilchrist-charlotte-bobcats-plan

 

The Bobcats were getting worse on purpose, just as Boston and San Antonio did in the lead-up to the Tim Duncan lottery, just as the Sixers and Jazz are doing now, and just as other teams will do as long as the league uses a reverse-order lottery to determine draft order. It's a choice for which the organization won't apologize. "Our players then were only so good," says Rod Higgins, the team's president of basketball operations. "We went to the playoffs, and we were swept four straight. We had to move on."

 

...

 

Charlotte, in other words, patiently pursued a "one step back, two steps forward" strategy, but lost patience with it right before the draft class that represented pay dirt. That may be wrong in the eyes of the calculating strategist thinking about those 55 wins, but not every franchise approaches team-building that way — at least not on every step of the team-building journey. Owners can lose patience if things still look bleak after two years of rebuilding; Michael Jordan, the team's majority owner, is famously competitive and impatient, and executives around the league still aren't sure who makes the final calls among Jordan, Higgins, and Rich Cho, the team's GM. Multiple lotteries might fail to produce a franchise-level star, damn near a must-have for any true title contender, an unfillable hole that leaves a franchise in a non-glamour market like Charlotte with a question: continue to go all-out in pursuit of one, or see if we can build to something "pretty good" over the long haul?

 

...

 

Those 55 wins recede further into the distance if Charlotte wins just enough games this season to fall outside the top five in the 2014 draft. Depending on health, luck, and player development, sticking within that range might be tight. Orlando and Philly are gunning for the top of the draft; Utah and Phoenix are in similar developmental stages; Sacramento is always a good bet to malfunction; and Boston wants a shot at a high pick. Toss in one or two injury- or trade-ravaged disappointments, and the Bobcats could suddenly be looking at a pick in the lower half of the top 10. And they won't seem to care.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am clearly a blind homer, but I think some people underestimate our young core.

We may not have a superstar, but with several future draft picks we have the ability to develop into a Pacers type team where we have no stars but with great talent deep into our bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am clearly a blind homer, but I think some people underestimate our young core.

We may not have a superstar, but with several future draft picks we have the ability to develop into a Pacers type team where we have no stars but with great talent deep into our bench.

I agree, I actually think that we could sneak into the playoffs with this team if everyone plays up to their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am clearly a blind homer, but I think some people underestimate our young core.

We may not have a superstar, but with several future draft picks we have the ability to develop into a Pacers type team where we have no stars but with great talent deep into our bench.

I agree, I actually think that we could sneak into the playoffs with this team if everyone plays up to their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after failing to land the #1 pick these past two drafts when they were in a prime position to do so, the organization realized that the system is rigged against them and maybe it's best to just move on than keep tanking for these stupid lottery balls that somehow miraculously bounce for certain teams at convenient times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please explain

We have Detroit and Portland's first round picks as long as both team don't suck it up completely. Looking at their roster we should end up with both picks for this draft leaving the cats with 3 first rounders in a very nice draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To bad they don't mention that even if we drop out of the top of the draft, we may end up with 3 first round picks.

 

It was mentioned?

 

(The Bobcats could potentially receive low lottery or mid-first-round picks from both Portland and Detroit in the 2014 draft, though both picks might not come until 2015 or later if Detroit and Portland struggle.)

 

 

As for the team, the discussion of which direction to go has been had many times here, and while I would've preferred all-out tanking this year, we're still going to be bad IMO unless EVERYTHING falls right. With the potential of there being as many as 8 All-Stars in this draft (ESPN's number), I'm confident we land someone worthy of helping carry this franchise. 

 

Someone out of Wiggins, Randle, Parker, Smart, Exum, Gordon, or Harrison would potentially give us one hell of a future when added to Kemba, MKG, Zeller and cap space. Although I'd imagine Kemba would be sent packing if Exum, Smart, or Harrison were the pick for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have Detroit and Portland's first round picks as long as both team don't suck it up completely. Looking at their roster we should end up with both picks for this draft leaving the cats with 3 first rounders in a very nice draft.

ok I knew that already. I feel like we need our own top 5 pick. we should use there's for possible trade bait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • keaton is a former Catamount.  The list I saw had only 2--Sanker and Emmanwori.  But I do recall hearing about Bowman. The theory that we are looking for specific hybrid safeties is upheld by this.  Keaton fits the "type" who can play zone or deep and in the box.  "He's a physical player with a high motor and a nose for the football. He has a good understanding of zone coverage and can play in the box as a force defender. Keaton is a leader and has earned a single-digit jersey number at Temple, a tradition reserved for team leaders." At WCU, he averaged 6.5 tackles per game, leading the team before transferring. Sanker has special teams abilities and a high football IQ.  He can cover TEs and RBs and keeps the play in front.  He would be a nice fit as a depth player.  I did not know they met with Bowman at the SR bowl.  He is more of a free safety who struggles in tackling/run support, but that is not to say he is not versatile within his capabilities. Stark is a SS who is a brutal hitter, but I don't see his hybrid qualities--they met with him at the Combine when everyone was in the building, but that was nearly 2 months ago and I don't think there has been contact since. Emmanwori is who they would love to have in my opinion.  NFL Draft Buzz:  "His ability to play in the box, handle man coverage responsibilities, and deliver bone-crushing hits makes him an ideal fit for defenses that ask their safeties to wear multiple hats." So it seems they are looking for a type.  The Keaton pick is intriguing to me because he is a sleeper who would clearly be there in round 5 or later.  They seem attracted to his characteristics, and he is a thumper who can play deep.  To me, the fact that they want 2 hybrid safeties of a certain type is rather obvious.  Maybe I am forcing a round peg into a square hole, but I love trying to see what skillsets teams value to guess draft picks.
    • Because it’s all bullshit and they know it’s bullshit. 
    • I'm hoping the Jets draft Warren over an OT, that way he won't be on the board WHEN (not if) we bypass him for a less polished player.  BPA my arse.  I know, I know, he might not be that high on our board, even though roughly 95% of all Big Boards I've seen has him at least a top 8 talent.  VERY seldomly to I see him ranked lower than that.  Granted he's slated to get drafted lower than that value simply because TE is a niche positional need.  Again, Sanders is not a TE1, he's a TE2.  I mean, we tried to make Ian Thomas a TE1 for how long?  Thomas was at best a TE3, but we kept trying.
×
×
  • Create New...