Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Soccer '13-'14 season


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Lol, not what Fox reported today.

 

I guess Fox is a little behind on the news. I believe Henry said this 2-3 days ago. It was addressed and no action is being taken except for an Arsenal fan starting a petition.

 

PFA Chief Gordon Taylor took a look at the contract when this whole saga was going on. This is what he had to say:

 

Gordon Taylor: "It does not say the club has to sell. It quite clearly states £40million is a minimum offer for discussions."

 

Suarez was "prepared to take legal action against the club" but agreed to mediate before. That's when Taylor came in. He read over the contract, explained that it wasn't a strict release clause, and everyone moved on. That's why no legal action was ever taken.

 

Now that Henry came out and said "Suarez had a release clause and we decided not to sell because contracts in football don't seem to mean anything" does not change the language of the original contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't be surprised if Fox fabricate poo again. But it would be a major infringement if team lied about contract and refused to sell a player.

 

You are absolutely right. Arsenal would be likely be able to receive serious damages and I wouldn't be surprised if the FA could keep Liverpool out of cup competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liverpool pass FFP. Man City among 76 clubs to face inquiry.

 

Have a link to that? I'd be curious to see how all the clubs fared.

 

 

I did try and find something and came up with this. Not sure Liverpool will pass next year from what my basic skimming of this article led me to believe:

 

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/

 

EDIT: Nevermind, I found the article. It just says Man City may be one of 76 clubs, but won't release the list until April. That's going to be an interesting month. The good news for me, is that apparently, Spurs have been doing it right (along with Arsenal) in gaining more points than spending, even after this past summer of big money signings. Salaries/purchases haven't exceeded revenues, so I'm happy right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a link to that? I'd be curious to see how all the clubs fared.

 

 

I did try and find something and came up with this. Not sure Liverpool will pass next year from what my basic skimming of this article led me to believe:

 

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/

 

EDIT: Nevermind, I found the article. It just says Man City may be one of 76 clubs, but won't release the list until April. That's going to be an interesting month. The good news for me, is that apparently, Spurs have been doing it right (along with Arsenal) in gaining more points than spending, even after this past summer of big money signings. Salaries/purchases haven't exceeded revenues, so I'm happy right now.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2570344/Manchester-City-Chelsea-76-European-clubs-investigated-FFP-breaches.html

 

City is one of the 76 teams facing further inquiry. No decision has been made. From what I gathered a few weeks ago, they were going to pass FFP due to contract signed more than 2 years ago or something.

 

If Liverpool makes UCL next year, we should be ok. If not, we could be looking at some consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug CHELSEA AND THAT fuging MIDGET PIECE OF poo ***** OF A MANAGER

 

 

 

Cheating, diving, ridiculous pussies... no way in hell we should have had that result. We were parking the bus and dominating until Verts slipped and got stupid. Then to make it worse, the, ahem, quality... of Chelsea came through,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...