Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lets talk about posts, threads and staying on topic for this forum.


Kurb

Recommended Posts

First Racism:

 

For roughly the past 2-3 years the subject of racism has slithered it's way into this FOOTBALL forum. Whether is be through subtle comments, blatant comments, and just overly long and offtopic back and forths. These destroy what meaningful conversation that actually occurs on CarolinaHuddle.com. 

 

Frankly, I am beyond sick of it.

 

This is a football forum, as such, I strongly suggest people talk about football and football only here. If you want to wallow in the internet discussions of Racism or whatever then check out the Tinderbox forum near the bottom.

 

If you bring up Racism here, Bant.

If you engage with others comments about racism here, Bant.

If I THINK you are trying to be subtly talking about racism, Bant.

If you are accusing people of Racism, true or not, Bant.

If you are being Racist or I THINK you are being Racist, Bant.

 

These are 24 hour bans, subsequent bans will be longer or permanent.

 

 

Next Stupid fuging Threads.

 

We currently have a 100 post Min to create a new thread. This is to keep the "HEY GAIS LOOK AT THIS THING THAT HAS 3 THREADS ALREADY BUT HERE IS MY THOUGHTS ON THIS SUBJECT IN A NEW THREAD" threads and related threads. If you can make threads and we feel you are making shitty threads on a regular basis, I will delete your post count and you can wait until you get to 100 before you make new threads again.   If you do this on a regular basis or spam up this forum on a game day I will flat remove your ability to start threads for a few weeks AND delete your post count. 

 

 

 

Finally, Be Nice.

 

We have a SMACK forum for a reason. In the past I have disliked calling people out threads in that forum, but I am seeing that it may be needed. You guys are straight assholes in here sometimes. Disagreeing with other posters is expected, calling the fugtard mouthbreathing dickbreaths is somewhat uncalled for.  So, Abuse to other posters will get you a warning, 3 warnings and you take 24 hours off. If you feel someone is that dumb, make a smack thread and go insult (within legal levels) to your hearts delight. If they care about your opinions (they shouldnt) then they can do deal with it there. 

 

 

Thanks for playing

Kurb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about gay slurs, then? Seems to be way more rampant. Not ok to hate on race but ok to hate on sexual orientation?

 

Yeah, ok, fanny packs are gay... but is it really ok to call Matt Ryan (or another poster) a fuging fine young male?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about gay slurs, then? Seems to be way more rampant. Not ok to hate on race but ok to hate on sexual orientation?

 

Yeah, ok, fanny packs are gay... but is it really ok to call Matt Ryan (or another poster) a fuging fine young male?

 

I agree with this statement....maybe not the rampant piece but everything else I agree with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...