Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Release Hangartner

carp24000

By carp24000,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

Again and again Gettleman has sent the same message, I suggest you all get it along with the players on this team.

 

This is a business and then a family. You will get paid, per what you are able to do, if you make to much take a cut or be released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

This must mean we are signing Moore.  Wharton isn't even fully healthy. 

 

I would certainly hope we didn't cut Hangman only to sign Wharton..  Seems like both moves could have been made and not taken too much more cap room.

 

 

first questionable move by gettleman imo. Gross and Kalil were really really good friends with Hangman. Having continuity and meshing well is arguably the most important aspect of an offensive line. 

 

not a good reason to me for Hangman to stick around..  his continuity with those 2 still made him below average.

I would wait to see what happens next..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

first questionable move by gettleman imo. Gross and Kalil were really really good friends with Hangman. Having continuity and meshing well is arguably the most important aspect of an offensive line. 

 

We all know GH sucks. Great, he's a nice guy. He can still hang out with the boys in the offseason.

 

For too long this team has emphasized having a bunch of nice guys around whether they can play or not. Glad to see that might be changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pilot2011 Newbie

pilot2011

Posted
Posted

Im not saying he should be a starter, he obviously knew he was already on thin ice after drafting Kugbila. Releasing him completely is what is questionable to me. We all know that depth at oline is our biggest weakness, thats all im saying... Being friends with our best leaders and team captains may sound arbitrary, but I've got to wonder if those guys are thinking the same thing that I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...