Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ruff's 7-28 Camp Observations


Ruff

Recommended Posts

I remember when I posted that Oregon vs USC game where Barner had like 350 yards and 5 tds and people told me it was just the system and he looked slow. lol

And like rayzor said, Barner is gonna be a chess piece. I don't think he can pass block very well yet.

So many posts saying meh...not impressed..lol

A lot of Huddlers are Like a bunch of porn desensitized married guys...no joy in beauty anymore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm probably in the minority here, but i don't even think he needs to be much of a blocker. i mean it would be nice to have more help there, esp. considering how ugly the big uglies are so far, but i think that he's gonna be someone that defenses always have to account for everytime he's on the field. there's gonna have to be a spy put on him him anytime he's on the field because there are so many ways he could be used and because of the damage he'd be able to do so quickly after touching the ball. his presence on the field will help cam out because it forces attention away from him. basically it takes a potential pass rusher out of the equation.

 

of course all of that depends on his usage and his ability to not suck when he's on the field. I'm just seeing a lot of outside of the box potential with this guy.

 

Cam gushing about a 6th round draft pick and mentioning him repeatedly in interviews probably bodes well that Shula and Cam are gonna utilize him. Can't wait to see if he's got it at the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many posts saying meh...not impressed..lol

A lot of Huddlers are Like a bunch of porn desensitized married guys...no joy in beauty anymore...

 

I remember specifically saying "watch this play" where Barner gets stood up by the entire usc d-line and jukes and evades like 5 blockers and dives for a first down on 3rd and 2. people were just like, "he looks slow"

 

wtf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure it will be a matter of getting a lot of snaps. i think he'll end up with significantly less than williams, stewart, and even cam. i just think his skill set and the situations will be able to translate into big yardage plays and if it's anywhere near the red zone he could wind up easily breaking off into the end zone. his touches will likely be limited, but his yards per touch won't be.

btw, i think he'll translate just fine into the pros. i don't see him as being much as a blocker, but i also don't think you expect him to be. he's a big play weapon. that's all.

With a franchise QB like Cam....he still has to be good enough at blocking to trust on the field. If he can be that....by year end I think we could easily see the fan base start jumping on his bandwagon and off part of double trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can honestly say, after watching Kenjon Barner live, I think he may be the fastest player on the team. I'd like to see him, and whoever else, race.

I think Ginn has everyone beat. He probably is second. Gettis might have more top end speed but I would wager Barner gets into top gear quicker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ginn has everyone beat. He probably is second. Gettis might have more top end speed but I would wager Barner gets into top gear quicker

 

I'm not even sure that Gettis has more top end speed. Barner is also a former track star, so gettis doesn't have the advantage of track running over him. Ginn is also fast, and smooth, but damn Barner is like lightning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barner is going to be a weapon........at no time should he be blocking.

 

He won't be there to fool a defense but to put it under stress.

 

Someone on D is going to have to cover him in the open field.........good luck.

 

He is our "scat-back"  the coaches have been looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barner is going to be a weapon........at no time should he be blocking.

He is our "scat-back" the coaches have been looking for.

If he is going to be in shotgun spread sets....he absolutely has to be able to block if called upon.

Unless you just expect us to run a draw every play he is in or a zone read.

Can't have someone who can't block be called to block an overloaded blitz with an audible. Sproles....while tiny....doesn't suck at pass protection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is going to be in shotgun spread sets....he absolutely has to be able to block if called upon.

Unless you just expect us to run a draw every play he is in or a zone read.

Can't have someone who can't block be called to block an overloaded blitz with an audible.

 

Barner is going to be called into shotgun formations, but he's going to be used in screen passes. In fact, there was a nice little screen pass to DWill that went just like that today.

 

Also, I expect him to line up as a receiver in a 5 wide set, coming out of the backfield, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barner is going to be called into shotgun formations, but he's going to be used in screen passes. In fact, there was a nice little screen pass to DWill that went just like that today.

Also, I expect him to line up as a receiver in a 5 wide set, coming out of the backfield, as well.

But again, to be on the field for those type plays....they still have to trust he can sufficiently pass protect if need be to routinely see the field.

Darren Sproles is basically what you want him to be....Sproles wouldn't see the field as much if he couldn't pass protect if need be. Sproles can. Barner will have to prove he can step up and pass protect to be a routine fixture as a a Sproles type weapon.

I wouldn't expect much 5 wide....that isn't the Norv tree or Shula way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...