Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Still The Leader For Jamison


Recommended Posts

While chasing a ring in a different city is still an option for Jamison, the Charlotte Bobcats seem to be the frontrunner to sign him at this point. Jamison grew up in Charlotte and is interested in returning home and living year-round with his four children. He flirted with the Bobcats last offseason for this very reason, and may decide to join them now. While he would most likely have to endure a losing season, he’d get to play a large role and be one of the team’s veteran leaders alongside Al Jefferson and Ben Gordon as well as his former teammates Ramon Sessions and Brendan Haywood. HoopsWorld

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This news makes you think that?

Yeah we are signing veteran players (Jefferson/Jamison/Hendo), we must be trying to win right? If we planned on tanking I don't signing Jefferson/Hendo is gonna help the cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care at this point. I dont say Jamison getting huge minutes anyway. Probably bring him in for some locker room leadership and experience to help the young guys.

 

 

He'd probably get 15-20 minutes a game, he'd be stealing minutes away from McRoberts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as he knows his role, your not coming home to be the star, your not at Providence anymore. 10-15 mins off the bench as a stretch 4 is alright with me, play him with McRoberts, but do not let him steal McRoberts minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combining the past two years we are one of the worst teams in NBA History... I wouldn't say we're good.

I didnt mean it like that. I just feel like we don't need a aged Jamison to take away minutes from the pf and sf spot with Taylor mkg zeller mcbob and adrien. So yeah we are good at that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...