Gay player...problem fans

[carolina-chuck]

The fans will accept gay players. The question is, will the media accept it?

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

The fans will accept gay players. The question is, will the media accept it?

Do you really think Oakland Raider fans would accept a gay player? I sure as hell don't.

[BBQ&Beer]

Well there are opinions and everyone is entitled to their opinions but I haven't attacked one single person, which is considered bullying.

Single person? No. Entire group? Yes.

I haven't bad mouth one single person I have just diagnosed an issue that most people don't want to touch because no one wants to be considered politically incorrect.

Actually, its because you can't back up your "diagnosis".

It's not retarded, its functional retardation.

Then you'll have no problem presenting peer reviewed studies that were published in medical journals that agree with your claim that homosexuality is caused by underdeveloped brain/brain function.

[carolina-chuck]

Do you really think Oakland Raider fans would accept a gay player? I sure as hell don't.

 

Of course they would. Just not any gay players playing in SD or SF.

[ThunderKatt]

your responses and the way you handled adversity clearly proves that you are not qualified to have a phd.  i could call your approach idiot and could argue that you prove otherwise, which you have failed to do.  

 

retardation comes in all forms, if something is slow to fully develop and then it hatches then it was affected by retardation.  if you are frying some chicken that normally takes 10 minutes to cook and the timer goes off and it's not fully cooked then there's an issue.  just as if a chicken was in an egg and it hatched before one leg could completely grow then that chicken was affected by retardation.  the mind works the same way, if someone hatched before they received all of their hormones, or brain didn't fully develop then they are affected by retardation.

Describing you as a moron is not name calling. It is merely defining your position as moronic.  IE. Everything you have said or proposed in this thread is moronic. 

 

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

Of course they would. Just not any gay players playing in SD or SF.

So as long as we all accept the gay players on our own team, we can make fun of the gay players on other teams?

Got it lol

[Leeroy Jenkins PhD]

If you are really a phd then you know that mental illness or anything else related to this thread is completely subjective.  I am not sure there are any accurate studies that prove one way or another.  As I have stated, I have opinions and so do you.  

 

Maybe you as a phd should start a case study and get down to the bottom of it.  Prove me wrong, at this stage there are just a matter of opinions.

 

You are absolutely wrong!  There are definitions to the words we use.  They have weight and power.  The term retardation brings with it an severe consequences.

 

We have a Diagnostic Statistical Manuel (DSM) that defines these terms for us here in the US.  The world has the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD). 

 

We do not arbitrarily throw these damaging terms around.  IT IS NOT COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE.  You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Three criteria must be met for a diagnosis of mental retardation: an IQ below 70, significant limitations in two or more areas of adaptive behavior (as measured by an adaptive behavior rating scale, i.e. communication, self-help skills, interpersonal skills, and more), and evidence that the limitations became apparent before the age of 18.

 

People spend their lives defining these terms.  You create a new one and claim that the field of practice is subjective, like you are some fugging authority on the subject.  It just pisses me off.  Feel free to admit you are wrong at any time.

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

This thread has a an IQ of 32, therefore it's retarded.

[rodeo]

just for the record there are currently 2 gay players on the Panthers roster.

[YoungPanthers89]

Im not even gonna read this thread but im guessing some people are using the bible as a source of information

[ThunderKatt]

you know just as well as anyone that there are always going to be conflicting stories because you are always going to have more than one side.  as long as that happens it will be hard to come to a conclusion.

 

Here's an article to back that up http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~cochran/pdf/emergingissueslgmentalorientationmatter.pdf

 

Single person? No. Entire group? Yes.

Actually, its because you can't back up your "diagnosis".


Then you'll have no problem presenting peer reviewed studies that were published in medical journals that agree with your claim that homosexuality is caused by underdeveloped brain/brain function.

 

[Guest HelloWorld]

Jackie Robinson was never a slave.

The story of Jackie Robinson is about him overcoming torment, harassment, threats and outrage by fans who didn't want someone of his skin color playing with white men.

A gay coming out would deal with all of these. Again, there's more to being gay than buttsex.

 

But his grandfather and father, who probably were still living at that time, was. So, the cause doesn't matter? Why prosecute crimes then, since it already happen, just treat the victim, right? I'm sure slavery didn't have any residual affect on society at all. Robinson was just an individual going through some stuff. 

[CarolinaPanthers8789]

just for the record there are currently 2 gay players on the Panthers roster.

I love to know who you think they are and please don't say Clausen.

[ThunderKatt]

It is subjective because you will always have a bias opinion and studies will always be slanted to a persons feelings.  That's how human operates.  Scientist will always be conflicted on how the world was created, experts will always be debating about how the mind works.

 

so until everyone can come to the same conclusion without any bias then it will be subjective.

You are absolutely wrong!  There are definitions to the words we use.  They have weight and power.  The term retardation brings with it an severe consequences.

 

We have a Diagnostic Statistical Manuel (DSM) that defines these terms for us here in the US.  The world has the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD). 

 

We do not arbitrarily throw these damaging terms around.  IT IS NOT COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE.  You obviously have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Three criteria must be met for a diagnosis of mental retardation: an IQ below 70, significant limitations in two or more areas of adaptive behavior (as measured by an adaptive behavior rating scale, i.e. communication, self-help skills, interpersonal skills, and more), and evidence that the limitations became apparent before the age of 18.

 

People spend their lives defining these terms.  You create a new one and claim that the field of practice is subjective, like you are some fugging authority on the subject.  It just pisses me off.  Feel free to admit you are wrong at any time.