Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

speaking of nicknames...


Recommended Posts

what the hell is "gap integrity"?

It is a basic concept known to folks from pee wee football on up.

In rushing the passer or in run defense the defender stay in his rushing lane through a designated gap to keep from getting caught out of position particularly against the draw. Something highly valued by Fox. It will be interesting to see how that plays out when meeks send everyone at the quarterback to get a sack and we are vulnerable to the run. A problem he had in Indianapolis. Hopefully Kemo keeps the middle clogged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how that plays out when meeks send everyone at the quarterback to get a sack and we are vulnerable to the run. A problem he had in Indianapolis. Hopefully Kemo keeps the middle clogged.

meeks's defense...or better yet, dungy's defense wasn't the problem in indy.

bob sanders is indy's run defense.

where he goes the defense goes.

much the same way beason and harris are key to carolina's run defense.

when harris and beason were hurt last season, the panthers' run defense went south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meeks's defense...or better yet, dungy's defense wasn't the problem in indy.

bob sanders is indy's run defense.

where he goes the defense goes.

much the same way beason and harris are key to carolina's run defense.

when harris and beason were hurt last season, the panthers' run defense went south.

If it wasn't defense than what was it- offense??? They were 24th in run defense in 2008 with a banged up Sanders. In 2007 with Sanders playing 15 games they were 15th. Don't see that as a big difference as it was around 12 yards per game. They were similar to us the past 2 years and we admit we have largely sucked the past 2 years. Seems by most standards that means they sucked as well.

As for why our run defense was poor, it wasn't Beason or Harris that caused the problems so much as the defensive line and our DTs in particular. When kemo and Lewis went down we went south in a hurry. Most folks didn't even know Beason was hurt until after the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't defense than what was it- offense??? They were 24th in run defense in 2008 with a banged up Sanders. In 2007 with Sanders playing 15 games they were 15th. Don't see that as a big difference as it was around 12 yards per game. They were similar to us the past 2 years and we admit we have largely sucked the past 2 years. Seems by most standards that means they sucked as well.

not a big difference?

if you go by ypg...12 yards is the difference between their 15th ranking and dallas being ranked 6th in '07. sometimes you have to look at other factors to gauge run and pass defense.

the difference is the big plays. in '07 with sanders, they only gave up 4 20+ yard runs. with a beat up sanders last season, they gave up 11 20+, and 3 40+ runs. in '06 when he was practicly put on the shelf...18 20+ and 4 40+.

As for why our run defense was poor, it wasn't Beason or Harris that caused the problems so much as the defensive line and our DTs in particular. When kemo and Lewis went down we went south in a hurry. Most folks didn't even know Beason was hurt until after the season.

the secondary was the reason why carolina kept the league's top RBs under 100 yards rushing the beginning of the season. (the secondary is why the defense showed promise in 07). if you scan thru beason's and harris's blogs, they both were hurt before kemo and lewis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a big difference?

if you go by ypg...12 yards is the difference between their 15th ranking and dallas being ranked 6th in '07. sometimes you have to look at other factors to gauge run and pass defense.

the difference is the big plays. in '07 with sanders, they only gave up 4 20+ yard runs. with a beat up sanders last season, they gave up 11 20+, and 3 40+ runs. in '06 when he was practicly put on the shelf...18 20+ and 4 40+.

the secondary was the reason why carolina kept the league's top RBs under 100 yards rushing the beginning of the season. (the secondary is why the defense showed promise in 07). if you scan thru beason's and harris's blogs, they both were hurt before kemo and lewis.

I won't deny that Sanders makes a difference in their defense but their poor numbers last year were due to more than him. Indy's defense has always benefitted from an offense that controls the clock, puts up points and forces teams to throw the ball to catch up primarily with the pass. Indy's offense in 2008 was 13th in points and 15th in yards. In 2007 they were 3rd in points scored and 5th in yards. In 2007 they were 3rd in TOP at 29.49 while in 2008 they were at 28.39 (26th). Consider that until Indy got going late in the season the numbers were even worse. Those numbers were more of a factor than Bob Sanders alone. He is good but this is a team sport.

As for our guys both Beason and Harris played all 16 games. They may have been banged up and clearly Beason says he was a one armed tackler at the end of the year, still Beason made the same number of tackles in 2008 as he did in 2007 and other than NO was in double digits almost every game.

On the other hand look at what happened when Kemo and Lewis went out- we get gashed for a franchise record high number of yards against the Giants and Kemo had one tackle in the last 3 games. When you give up 120 yards rushing to Denver without him you know something is wrong.

And the secondary was no more the reason for our run defense than the D line and linebackers. We played differently the first half of the year when we had a bunch of high profile runners like LT, Forte, AP, Johnson, et all at the beginning of the season. We played more 8 in the box so obviously Harris was a factor but honestly I think of him more as an extra linebacker most of the time since his coverage skills are somewhat suspect and he rarely plays deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That would be a great pick, he might be my favorite for us right now. 
    • The coach- Canales was a rookie hc and at times looked like it. But he did manage to revamp the offense, helped Bryce not look like the biggest bust of the draft, exuded positivity,  and made the panthers watchable again. We have a viable head coach for the first time since rivera The gm- Morgan had some hits and some big misses. Hits- the ol, Coker,demani, dj at first. Misses- almost every d player signed, brooks, the jury is out on x. I get what he was trying to do with brooks/Hubbard but it blew up in his face. Hopefully he learns from his mistakes. But he did trade mingo for a 4th, managed to get a 2nd rounder this year from the Rams and I am a fan of constantly churning the bottom of the roster The draft- x can be a solid player but not until he catches the ball, brooks was a high risk pick that didn't work out, Wallace, demani and Chau Smith can be solid contributors and showed glimpses, Coker and jt should be mainstays. And flipping a 7th round lb that was about to be cut for Jackson was a great move.  The offense- had its ups and downs but Bryce has turned from one of the biggest busts in nfl history to a potential franchise qb, that change is worth its weight in gold, thielen was crafty and underrated as usual, Coker was a gem, jt was the solid but has some growing to do, and Hubbard has been awesome, the o line was much improved as well The defense- well...they set records, injuries, poor coaching (imo), bad playcalling and just plain sucking this defense needs everything to change, we need horn and Jackson back and we get brown back but we need bodies and an identity. If they can do with the def what they did with the o then we can challenge for the division bc we already have some pieces there.  Overall- this was a growth year full of questions and some of the major ones were answered(qb, coach). For the first time in a long time the season didn't end depressingly and I do have cautious optimism for next year. But they need to learn from the mistakes of 2024 and if they do I like where this team is headed. On to the draft and 2025
×
×
  • Create New...