Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Update: Aaron Hernandez Charged with Murder/ Cut by the Patriots


TheRumGone

Recommended Posts

Or, gasp, the guy suing is just an opportunistic SOB trying to get money out of Hernandez.

 

 

 

While I understand that's the knee jerk reaction when someone sues given all the ridiculous and frivolous suits that get filed, I think being shot in the fuging face is about as legit of a reason to sue as I can think of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I edited my op. Sounds like he was payed 4 days after the suite was filed. The victim probably claimed it to be an accident and/or was asked to keep quiet. After he got money of course.

Still sounds kind of sketchy. I will wait and reserve any sort of conclusion until more facts come out.

If he is guilty of these things it is a damn shame he's throwing his life away, and even more so for the victims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand that's the knee jerk reaction when someone sues given all the ridiculous and frivolous suits that get filed, I think being shot in the fuging face is about as legit of a reason to sue as I can think of.

 

 

I can not think of too many more legit reasons.  Changed the guys life forever I am sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand that's the knee jerk reaction when someone sues given all the ridiculous and frivolous suits that get filed, I think being shot in the fuging face is about as legit of a reason to sue as I can think of.

 

All I'm saying is look at the facts:

 

This conveniently gets announced after the murder probe news breaks. It's a civil suit, why didn't the guy have criminal charges pressed? 

 

It occurred in a state where gunshot wounds to the face in a hospital immediately trigger a police investigation. Why were the police not initially involved when the alleged incident occurred?

 

 

 

Any physician, nurse, or employee thereof and any employee of a hospital, sanitarium, clinic, or nursing home knowingly treating any person suffering from a gunshot wound or life-threatening injury indicating an act of violence, or receiving a request for such treatment, shall report the same immediately to the sheriff's department of the county in which said treatment is administered or request therefore received.

 

 

He waits a month and apparently it's a paperwork issue? Right.

 

Lastly, the guy is quoted as saying

 

 

 

...the bullet initially struck him in the arm and continued traveling through his body until it struck him in the face .... blowing out his eyeball.

 

How the hell does that make sense? Can someone MS Paint that for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the hell does that make sense? Can someone MS Paint that for me?

Guy A points the gun at guy B, guy B says "dude quit fugging around!" & puts his hand up/tries to push the gun so it is pointed elsewhere, gun goes off, travels up the arm, ricochets off the shoulder on an upward angle, exits near eye.

Having said that, I'd have to see the medical report/hear it from the Dr. to believe that because while possible, its highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear half this board has the reading comprehension of a 6 year old. That statement isn't saying that the bullet traveled within his body, ie internally, from his hand to eye. It's stating that the bullet passed through his hand and then struck his face, blowing out his eye. Meaning the bullet went through his fuging hand and hit him in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HelloWorld

Jesus fuging Christ. Aaron Hernandez may be an accessory to murder and every other fuging comment is about their third string qb.

 

At least AH didn't pat his lawyer in the back.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear half this board has the reading comprehension of a 6 year old. That statement isn't saying that the bullet traveled within his body, ie internally, from his hand to eye. It's stating that the bullet passed through his hand and then struck his face, blowing out his eye. Meaning the bullet went through his fuging hand and hit him in the face.

Believe it or not, it's possible. Also the claimant said to have suffered arm and shoulder damage so I doubt it passed directly through his hand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HelloWorld

I bet no one will whine and cry racism when I call this dude what he is. Thug.

 

I don't think you understand what a thug is. So, give it up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...