Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Update: Aaron Hernandez Charged with Murder/ Cut by the Patriots


TheRumGone

Recommended Posts

As far as whose crime is worse?  No question.

 

On the topic of who's the bigger idjit though?  There's an argument to be made for Hernandez.

 

He certainly had way more to lose than Carruth.

 

both of them gonna lose their anal virginity, that's the most important thing

 

but no, hernandez loses his freedom and 40 mil

 

carruth lost his son

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both of them gonna lose their anal virginity, that's the most important thing

 

but no, hernandez loses his freedom and 40 mil

 

carruth lost his son

 

 

A son he tried to have killed.

 

To a normal person like you or me, a child is more valuable than money.

 

Not to Carruth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, mandatory sentencing guidelines.  He will probably plea down to murder 2 or something unless he feels they do not have a solid case.

 

With the media scrutiny and premeditation, I would be surprised if the DA allows a plea bargain in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His boys are flipping on him, giving up AH's secret apartment or "flop house".

In the $1,200 a month, two–bedroom apartment, authorities found a white hooded sweatshirt “consistent in color and type with the sweatshirt that Hernandez is observed to be wearing on surveillance cameras the night of the homicide,” according to the search warrant return. They also found a cranberry-colored baseball hat with the word ‘society’ written in light blue in the front, which the return said, was “observed on the head of Hernandez on Channel 7-Boston news. It was reported as a picture that was taken outside a club in Boston on Friday night.”

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/07/hernandez_pal_flips_tells_cops_about_secret_apartment?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...