Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Update: Aaron Hernandez Charged with Murder/ Cut by the Patriots


TheRumGone

Recommended Posts

hmmmmm...killing an adult male who probably knew what kind of poo he was getting involved in and that the people he was associating with had fuged up morals...

 

or killing the mother of your unborn baby because you didn't want to pay child support even though you're a millionare

 

yes, no debate there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A part of me wants to believe this wasn't his first murder, since he was so brazen in the "plotting" and "planning". But then again, he was the "mastermind" behind the dumbest crime and attempted coverup in human history. He left evidence literally everywhere. And then to think smashing his phone was going to be enough to prevent the po po from reading his texts. If he has killed before, he was lucky, not good.

Ted Bundy once talked about how he was so careful during the beginning of his killing spree. Towards the end, he just got lazy and left whatever behind.

Makes me wonder how much experience AH really has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Rae did was much worse than Hernandez. Not even close.

 

His motives might have been much worse, but taking a life and taking a life is the same. Try telling Lloyds family that their son, brother etc etc means less than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmmmm...killing an adult male who probably knew what kind of poo he was getting involved in and that the people he was associating with had fuged up morals...

 

or killing the mother of your unborn baby because you didn't want to pay child support even though you're a millionare

 

yes, no debate there

 

As far as whose crime is worse?  No question.

 

On the topic of who's the bigger idjit though?  There's an argument to be made for Hernandez.

 

He certainly had way more to lose than Carruth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...