Cam's second half improvement

[L-TownCat]

Cam will only get better as time goes on and are any of us bold enough to say that cam on any team with a decent defense in 11 and a competent OC in 12 wouldn't have made the playoffs? My point is, we have a stud under center and we may finally have those two aforementioned things to complement him(competent OC and decent defense). This could be a great year.

[iBBB]

That's not what he's saying at all. For the first have the season lets saying Rodgers has a 96.4 passer rating. Then the second half of the second he have a 96.8 passer rating. He's stayed the same. While Bradford can have 79.2 passer rating the first half and a 79.4 passer rating the last half they both with show as staying the same. He's not staying Bradford is on par with Rodgers just that the graph isn't showing the context of they've been throwing. So blanket statements like the ones in the middle are more consistent isn't completely true

 

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

[tiger7_88]

it's 2nd half of the season, not 2nd half of games.

 

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

[nosuchthingasapanther]

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

 

thank you for clearing this up.

[nickzz]

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

 

i don't know. when people say crunch time i think the end of games.

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

[tiger7_88]

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

 

That's exactly what I was saying.

 

 Because Luck's performance was less-than-average in most of those games BUT HIS TEAM WAS WINNING ANYWAY.

 

Luck's worst performances of the year were in the 2nd half of the season in games they critically needed to win to get into the playoffs.

[CarolinaCoolin]

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass.

Yeah you didn't listen either. Good job. I said not completely true. While its true they were consistent they weren't on the same level which what i was trying to tell the person I responded.

[SOJA]

You know who I am getting a little sick of getting a ton of attention: Ryan Tannehill- the guy hasn't proven anything, yet people are picking the Dolphins to win the division. Brady could pick three random huddlers  to be his starting wide-outs and still be a better QB than Tannehill next year. 

[Match.com]

Nice graph bro!

[Match.com]

That wasn't a joke....you did your research

[lovelett]

You know who I am getting a little sick of getting a ton of attention: Ryan Tannehill- the guy hasn't proven anything, yet people are picking the Dolphins to win the division. Brady could pick three random huddlers to be his starting wide-outs and still be a better QB than Tannehill next year.

That is exactly what is happening down here in Florida, everyone thinks tannehill is going to dominate and Wallace is going to get 1500 yards. i hate the patriots as much as everyone else but tannehill was not even good last year and now they are going to beat the Pats?

[SIGCHI222]

حسنا اللعنة لي الثابت واتصل بي سالي.