Out of the WR's on the roster who aren't 89.

[Match.com]

AE nuff said!

[CRA]

lol, now who is being generous? So you're giving stew all the credit for the panthers having the most productive season in team history? I bet Stewart diesnt agree with that statement. And you don't think that stat had nothing to do with cam at all? Lmbo.

So you think its safe to say that legs was brought in to coach the receivers, lol again. If the positions coach weren'capable then they shouldn't have been apart of the team. In no way shape or form should a player have the responsibility to coach players. I like that 1.

As far as lafell having Better stats then fox must have been nuts to demote him. t

Um, no....I brought up Stewart in 2011 initially to show just bc someone is listed as a starter doesn't mean he is the primary guy on the field.

Then playing Stewart more than Williams as a reason Ron was a bad coach....which I disagreed with. The offense was fine in 2011. Ron giving Stewart more reps wasn't a poor coaching move

It was a shortened offseason....and yes, Legapoo was brought in bc he new the offense. Our coaches and players have repeatedly praised him for his role of making sure our starting lineup was where they were suppose to be. Players and coaches have confirmed his duties of aiding the starters that season making sure they lined up right

[lovelett]

no, lol. Have you heard of cam newton, lmbo. You guys are comedy.

 

 

The only point I was trying to make was the Murphy and Gettis had similiar production there rookie years, and Murphy did not do poo here last year either (around 300 yards I think correct me if I am wrong).  I just do not see Gettis taking off either just cause he has a real QB, just my opinion, really hope that I am wrong, I am not a Gettis hater by any stretch.

[ThunderKatt]

imo rr doesn't know squat about running an offense and be.ching your all time leading rusher to prove you can do it without him to save mo.ey without an insurance policy is the dumbest thing of all times and anyone that supports such a dumbass decision us an idiot

Um, no....I brought up Stewart in 2011 initially to show just bc someone is listed as a starter doesn't mean he is the primary guy on the field.

Then playing Stewart more than Williams as a reason Ron was a bad coach....which I disagreed with. The offense was fine in 2011. Ron giving Stewart more reps wasn't a poor coaching move

[Floppin]

Anyone that thinks that coaches are solely in charge of long term personnel decisions, or that they bench players to prove for some asinine reason that they can save money, is a damned moron. As if coaches give two shits about saving payroll figures.

I'm not naming any names, but someone is making themselves look like a retard.

[CRA]

imo rr doesn't know squat about running an offense and be.ching your all time leading rusher to prove you can do it without him to save mo.ey without an insurance policy is the dumbest thing of all times and anyone that supports such a dumbass decision us an idiot

Again, our offense was historically good when he went Stewart heavy in 2011. Nothing dumb about it.

Stewart just wasn't healthy in 12.

Williams got demoted playing time in 11 bc Stewart was better. He got benched in 12 bc he he frankly wasn't good in the non Saints games collectively on the year.

[ThunderKatt]

I guess you are referring to someone that can't read between the simple lines. So if its not the coach that benches a player then who is it? To me ur would seem that anyone above rr that does the benching would likely cut a player they're not satisfied with whether pre or during the season.

I tend to see the other end of the spectrum, someone above rr is keeping those same players around for a reason. If you think the coach isn't in charge of the players that make the field game day then someone is a little slower than they lead on without saying any names.

Anyone that thinks that coaches are solely in charge of long term personnel decisions, or that they bench players to prove for some asinine reason that they can save money, is a damned moron. As if coaches give two shits about saving payroll figures.

I'm not naming any names, but someone is making themselves look like a retard.

[Floppin]

I guess you are referring to someone that can't read between the simple lines. So if its not the coach that benches a player then who is it? To me ur would seem that anyone above rr that does the benching would likely cut a player they're not satisfied with whether pre or during the season.

I tend to see the other end of the spectrum, someone above rr is keeping those same players around for a reason. If you think the coach isn't in charge of the players that make the field game day then someone is a little slower than they lead on without saying any names.

I never said that the head coach didn't decide who played on game day, it was your other asinine conclusions that I was pointing out as fallacious.

[ThunderKatt]

maybe I'm missing something but Williams had the 2nd biggest game for our rbs against the falcons too. Once again you need to regroup and come with a solid stance because last I checked Williams had 70 more rushing attempts and almost a yard per carry avg better than stew. Points are meant to be strong and your points aren't worth the time to even continue hacking this thread.

Again, our offense was historically good when he went Stewart heavy in 2011. Nothing dumb about it.

Stewart just wasn't healthy in 12.

Williams got demoted playing time in 11 bc Stewart was better. He got benched in 12 bc he he frankly wasn't good in the non Saints games collectively on the year.

[ThunderKatt]

well maybe you don't know what you're commenting on or you are picking and choosing what you want to debate about. However, your last comment posted means you don't know squat or you must be feeling sizzled.

I never said that the head coach didn't decide who played on game day, it was your other asinine conclusions that I was pointing out as fallacious.

[ThunderKatt]

one question why do you think 34 was benched? If you say urs not about the money then I want to know why because its always about the money my friend. Anyone that thinks its not about the money with any player then you're living on fantasy island and its time to start up the game show.

I never said that the head coach didn't decide who played on game day, it was your other asinine conclusions that I was pointing out as fallacious.

[Floppin]

one question why do you think 34 was benched? If you say urs not about the money then I want to know why because its always about the money my friend. Anyone that thinks its not about the money with any player then you're living on fantasy island and its time to start up the game show.

Ignoring the fact that Ron Rivera has absolutely ZERO involvement with team finances and therefore him benching someone because of some future cap projection is beyond retarded - the rest of your statement is so bereft of logic as to be laughable.

Williams was moved down on the depth chart because our coaching staff felt that Stewart better fit what we wanted to do as a team schematically, no other reason. They had already paid him for the year, therefore if he was the best back you play him. You don't bench him to prove you don't need him.....that's just fuging brain dead logic.

[YOLO!]

^Oh look Mr.Know It All

[ThunderKatt]

Di.g ding ding, don't be an idiot, everyone wants to save money and an NFL team is no different. Do you not think rr was asked, "hey ron, we have some contracts that we need to get get rid of, do you think there's some players that you think you can do with out?". That's the problem with some people you have to be told everything before you can draw your own opinion.

Your answer for benching the franchise all time leading rusher with miles still on the treads show just how inept your thinking really is. You don't just bench the leading guy with the biggest contract and he's still on the team 2 years later.

It's hard debating with someone that's under 20. The stats shows who's the best rusher if stats don't get through to to you then give me some stats unless you don't have any. If that's the case then there's nothing else to talk about.

Ignoring the fact that Ron Rivera has absolutely ZERO involvement with team finances and therefore him benching someone because of some future cap projection is beyond retarded - the rest of your statement is so bereft of logic as to be laughable.

Williams was moved down on the depth chart because our coaching staff felt that Stewart better fit what we wanted to do as a team schematically, no other reason. They had already paid him for the year, therefore if he was the best back you play him. You don't bench him to prove you don't need him.....that's just fuging brain dead logic.