Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Dumb is Greg Rosenthal? [Article]


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

Don't need to...I said he is 10ish. You can interchange and argue 5-15. A lot of aging TEs and talented TEs cloud that field.

For example, you probably would argue he is better than a guy like Mercedes Lewis. I think Olsen is on the same tier

So you make a dumb statement. Someone asks you to support it. You say you don't have too.

Yep...about a par for the course post from you. Otherwise known as smelly crap that you pulled out of your ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you make a dumb statement. Someone asks you to support it. You say you don't have too.

Yep...about a par for the course post from you. Otherwise known as smelly crap that you pulled out of your ass.

Nothing dumb about saying he is 10ish....and that area is cloudy with lots of bodies.

How is that pulling poo from your ass? I was responding to Kurb....and he seemed to take my reply as fair. Olsen isn't top 5....and there is a large cluster of guys after that. Could argue anyone in or out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theyre not giving us anything until we earn it

They are giving us plenty of dirty looks from down their noses. After all, we're a small market team. Isn't our purpose to develop players for the larger market/big fanbase teams to sn@tch away in free agency? Pretty sure that was a condition of Carolina being awarded a franchise.

 

Us silly little Carolinians aren't supposed to win. If we do that, the NFL won't rake in as much $$$ from the large market team's fanbases. Bottom lines will be in danger and they just can't have that.

 

On the other hand, who in the hell is gonna want to tell Da Kraken to get back in his cage so we can let a team that will draw higher playoff TV ratings get in instead? Who has two thumbs, is writing this diatribe, and ain't volunteering for THAT job? This guy.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing dumb about saying he is 10ish....and that area is cloudy with lots of bodies.

How is that pulling poo from your ass? I was responding to Kurb....and he seemed to take my reply as fair. Olsen isn't top 5....and there is a large cluster of guys after that. Could argue anyone in or out.

 

Perhaps you're right, but I can easily argue he has top five talent.

 

Regarding overall stats, you absolutely must take injury into account. Looking at their recent bodies of work, I have can easily argue that Olsen is better than Gronk, Hernandez and Gates.  The only consistent TEs that I can say are better than Olsen right now are Graham, Witten and Davis.  After those three, it's arguable. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's wrong about olsen, but he's not wrong about the secondary.

 

I'm not saying godfrey is good, but i do think he's the best one we have in the secondary. we have a godfrey, and old CB who's here more as a mentor than anything, and a bunch of unproven commodities...and i don't consider 5-6 games last year as being "proven".

 

i think we've got a bit of potential there, but right now we've got a secondary that is scary to me. not scary good, either. just scary as in i don't want them put in clutch situations. i think the pass rush and the front seven will limit the amount to which they'll be a liability, but if we get put in situations like that first ATL game or any other game we lost by less than 6 points i'm going to be getting a headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our secondary, in general, is gonna surprise a lot of people this year.

 

Godfrey is definitely a guy to watch. He is already a ball-hawk. With the D-line getting some pressure on the QB, we may see CG's game evolve to the next level.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have nothing against Mike Evans, it's that he keeps saying it's ridiculous for me to think T-Mac will be a better player than Evans, based on Evans totality of his career statistical output. They're not the same thing, at all.  Basically what he's arguing is that it would be insane for someone to say any RB coming into the league is going to be better than Frank Gore.  There are going to be LOTS of RBs over the years who are better than Gore but will never make the HOF.   Or how about comparing a QB to Rivers or Eli?  There are going to be a lot of QBs that you'd predict will be better, and for a period of time will be, but they won't be able to do it long enough to have the same career as those guys. Longevity of great play does not equal an elite player, it equals an elite career.  If you're building a team for one season, health aside and looking at peak performance, there are way too many WRs over the last decade that I'd take over Evans to consider him a true elite WR in my mind. For example, I looked it up, here is where he has finished every season ranked in Receptions and Yards 2014 - 36th in Rec and 19th in Yds 2015 - 30 and 11 2016 - 6 and 4 2017 - 23 and 15 2018 - 17 and 3 2019 - 36 and 13 2020 - 32 and 18 2021 - 28 and 22 2022 - 25 and 13 2023 - 24 and 9 2024 - 28 and 23 He's played 11 seasons, only twice finished higher than 23rd in receptions and 3 times in the Top 10 in yards, 5 of the 11 outside the Top 15.  Outside of 2016 and 2018, he really wasn't ever an elite WR outside of being an elite red zone threat.   Evans was a great WR who had an elite career, not an elite WR
    • I’m not sure what Mike Evans did to offend you but if we draft a WR at 8 that is Mike Evans I think everyone in Carolina would be ecstatic 
×
×
  • Create New...