Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you become romantically involved with someone that has an infant?


Floppin

Recommended Posts

Weird. I couldn't find it earlier when I searched. Ohh well. Thanks Alice.

Entertaining stuff, but c'mon, fess up, that's like the most common way to get stuff through mail story there is. You address it to a fictional persons name, your address, package comes and you don't open it for two days and write return to sender just in case it was caught in transit.

Ask anyone here, if you get a package addressed to your address, almost anyone opens it up to make sure the sending company didn't mess up the name or to make sure that someone is possibly ordering something under one of your accounts, etc.

The fact you go out, get the package, immediately write "all over it in big sharpie "Return to Sender" and then NOT EVEN TAKE IT INSIDE like its a bomb or something is not what the average person does. Even if you're one of the few people that wouldn't open it, you still take it inside and maybe call and setup a pickup for next day, call sending company on label to see if its for you, or something alomg those lines. You don't just immediately go grab a sharpie and draw "return to sender all over it and leave it outside.

Check out the first response to this thread about mailing drugs:

http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/13660810

you should not use a fake return address (but a real one)

mailmen are told not to deliver mail to a place with a nonexistent tenant i.e. bertha

if sally is worried she should write return to sender on package and leave it near door for a few days just in case she gets that knock(down)

Gee, write return to sender and leave by door, that sounds familiar,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alice, let me explain something to you. It's common logic that if you're concerned about something in a package you don't bring it into your house. I know people that mail poo to random vacant addresses and just pick it up after monitoring it for a few days. I had just moved into the house that month. I didn't know what was in it and I noticed that it didn't have my name on it. I'm not bringing that poo into my house and I'm sure as poo covering my ass by writing return to sender on it. 

 

Honestly, I don't give a poo what you believe. I got a two year probation sentence on what ended up being my third felony conviction (via plee agreement - plead no-contest), which has since expired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. I didn't know what was in it and I noticed that it didn't have my name on it. I'm not bringing that poo into my house and I'm sure as poo covering my ass by writing return to sender on it.

It's just strange that you are saying your first reaction was, oh wait, it's not my name, could be something illegal like drugs, need to cover my ass by writing Return to Sender and leave outside. Most people reaction if a package comes to their house isn't, could be drugs, must cover myself by writing RTS and leaving outside unopened.

Apparently nobody in judicial system bought that story either. Also it said the same random container it was packaged in matched a container exactly found in your house. Depending on quality, that was a $3k to $15k package someone paid for, if you had been there a month, no way someone doesn't check and make sure your house is still vacant right before placing order 3 days earlier, but since you had been there almost a month, obviously they would have seen it occupied.

I mean your theory is random guy spends maybe $10k to get stuff via mail and chooses a house he knew was empty a month earlier, but doesn't check the house out prior to ordering to make sure it's still empty, then you receive a package with your address, different name and Immediately you're like, could be drugs, will cover my ass, leave outside, write return to sender. That's your story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Packages and large dollar amounts being dropped off remind me of a simpler time. No tax returns. No kinkos and PO boxes. A guy gives you money to drive a car to A. You pick up another car and drive to B. Ahhhh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it was my first reaction. Your average Joe didn't  sell drugs for a decade in their past like I had.

 

But the house being picked as a vacant to have something mailed to is fairly plausible. The house was still for sale while I lived there. It had a for sale sign in the yard and, like I said, I had only been there a month. Additionally,  prior to me moving in the house had sat vacant for 6 months. It's very much within reason that someone was using the house as a regular drop point once or even twice a month, and I had just happened to move in without him checking. Perhaps they lived relatively close and yet out of town and only drove there to pick up a package once a month. Who fuging knows?

 

Point being, the story was plausible enough that they offered me a plea agreement, despite the fact that had TWO prior felony convictions for fuging selling weed. So you can blow me with the "obviously no one in the justice system bought it". 

 

Here's the dice you fuging tard - They didn't want to put it into court because they didn't really have a case other than my priors and the circumstantial fact that the box was in fact delivered to my residence. I didn't want to put it into court because I have priors and if the judge finds me guilty (fairly high chance considering my priors, regardless of real evidence) I'm facing prison time. I took the plea because it's the best course of action.

 

They asked me to give evidence to the SBI against my police officer neighbor because they thought he tipped me off when they didn't find any evidence. I mean really, you fuging cockpuppet, do you think that they would offer to drop my charges in exchange for me turning over states evidence against one of their own - if they had a strong case against me? They had diddlyshit and couldn't understand why, and the obvious answer - to them- was that I was tipped off to them coming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think they offered you a plea because "they really didnt have a case" then you are pretty naive. Less than 10% of criminal cases go to trial, 90% are offered plea deals!

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/opinion/sunday/go-to-trial-crash-the-justice-system.html?_r=0

 

This isn't some first offense. This was a third felony conviction. Some states put your ass away for a long ass time, no questions asked, on your third strike. Regardless, I'm not the one that's naive in this case. You have literally no idea how my case went down, other than what I've told you. You're, quite literally, just talking out of your ass. 

 

The second point you're missing that that yes, a ton of cases are offered plea deals. I, however, was offered a plea deal for only two years of Plain Jane probation on a case that didn't have a single mitigating factor (I didn't give testimony, or rat on anyone). That doesn't just happen, they don't just hand out two years of fuging regular supervised probation, to someone facing their third felony conviction unless they are trying to save face and get absolutely anything out of the arrest. 

 

Shut up and sit down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a hint for you, jackass. I got the same exact sentence of two years of probation on my FIRST arrest for A HALF fuging OUNCE when I was 18 years old. I then got 6 years of intense probation with a 6 o'clock curfew and weekly drug tests for my second arrest, which was 12 fuging GRAMS. Do you honestly think that after all that poo they are just going to give me two years of regular probation, the same poo I got 10 years earlier, for three goddamn pounds and 50 grams of hash? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...