Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Johnathan Jones of the Charlotte Observer: Impressions after Day 3


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I hope anyone who claims Delhomme was a game manager just recently came on board b/c of Cam and didn't even realize Carolina had a football team prior to Cam's existence.  I can forgive them in that case...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's this annoying new school mindset (i refuse to believe that gucci mane was older than 12 in 2003) that any quarterback who doesn't complete 65%-plus of his passes with like single digit INTs is a "game manager".

 

trent dilfer and brad johnson were game managers, okay?  their job was essentially to possess the ball, get in to field goal range, punch it in if possible, and not put their defense in an unfavorable position.

 

e: that's not to say that elite quarterbacks can't or aren't asked to manage the game in certain situations, of course, because they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm still laughing about that game manager thing. wow priceless.

 

gambler is a good description of him. i think gunslinger fits as well, mainly because i view gunslingers as being risk taking throw first, ask questions later, long ball guys. jake may not have had a cannon for an arm, but the dude launched more than a few long balls in his day into very crowded areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm still laughing about that game manager thing. wow priceless.

 

gambler is a good description of him. i think gunslinger fits as well, mainly because i view gunslingers as being risk taking throw first, ask questions later, long ball guys. jake may not have had a cannon for an arm, but the dude launched more than a few long balls in his day into very crowded areas.

yep.

 

Gunslinger IMO isn't about arm strength...it is about decision making and approach of the position.   Having a rocket arm doesn't make you a gunslinger....throwing into triple coverage 30 yards downfield off your backfoot with your tongue hanging out.... to your boy on 3rd and 5 for a TD does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is arguing Jake is elite or a HOFer.  But people claiming Jake in his prime would be a backup to Drew Stanton need to get there head checked.

 

Smitty is a HOF talent....who won't have a HOF resume if his career ended today.

 

No one claimed Jake would be Drew Stanton's back-up.

 

Anyway, just because you state that Smitty doesn't have a HOF resume doesn't mean that he doesn't have one.  When 89 hangs up his cleats---whether it be 3 days or three years---he is immediately in the discussion. many of his peers, past and present, seem to respect his resume more than some Panthers fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's this annoying new school mindset (i refuse to believe that gucci mane was older than 12 in 2003) that any quarterback who doesn't complete 65%-plus of his passes with like single digit INTs is a "game manager".

 

trent dilfer and brad johnson were game managers, okay?  their job was essentially to possess the ball, get in to field goal range, punch it in if possible, and not put their defense in an unfavorable position.

 

e: that's not to say that elite quarterbacks can't or aren't asked to manage the game in certain situations, of course, because they are.

 

yep. game managers job is to protect the ball...that means keep it on the ground as much as possible and throw short safe high percentage passes to open players with as little risk of losing the ball as possible.

 

we ran a lot, but we also threw a lot as well and i don't know many who didn't hold their breath just about every time jake cocked back that arm to throw cause you never knew what was going to happen. sometimes it would result in amazing catches that launch us downfield and other times it would get picked off...and each had about an equal chance of happening.

 

when it was crunch time in the 4th, tho, is when jake worked his magic. he was able to pull out some very tough wins mainly because of his gunslinger/gambling mindset.

 

one thing is for sure, he didn't play it safe. in '09 is when they tried turning him into a game manager and it failed miserably. they made him think about what he was doing and it screwed him up almost as much as having his elbow explode. he couldn't just react anymore. they tried backing off the coaching, but it was way too late. truthfully, tho, after tommy joe attacked him they should have been actively looking for his replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep.

 

Gunslinger IMO isn't about arm strength...it is about decision making and approach of the position.   Having a rocket arm doesn't make you a gunslinger....throwing into triple coverage 30 yards downfield off your backfoot with your tongue hanging out.... to your boy on 3rd and 5 for a TD does.

 

and with your pants ripped. can't forget that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm still laughing about that game manager thing. wow priceless.

 

gambler is a good description of him. i think gunslinger fits as well, mainly because i view gunslingers as being risk taking throw first, ask questions later, long ball guys. jake may not have had a cannon for an arm, but the dude launched more than a few long balls in his day into very crowded areas.

 

You laugh, but others thought of Delhomme as a game manager. The concept is far from foreign. Google Delhomme and "game manager". What in the world? Perhaps it's semantics or plain old revisionist history on someone's part, but Jake Delhomme was a known game manager by more than a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one claimed Jake would be Drew Stanton's back-up.

 

Anyway, just because you state that Smitty doesn't have a HOF resume doesn't mean that he doesn't have one.  When 89 hangs up his cleats---whether it be 3 days or three years---he is immediately in the discussion. many of his peers, past and present, seem to respect his resume more than some Panthers fans.

whatever comment was made about Drew Stanton, Shaun Hill, etc...that just ain't right.  You could say Jake Delhomme could outplay Manning, Brady, whoever on any given Sunday as well...

 

Smitty is a HOF talent.  He just doesn't have HOF numbers.  HOF is a numbers game.  If his career ended today, by the time he was eligible....nothing on his NUMBERS resume would standout.   His career yards will be his big number and by the time he is eligible it just won't be enough (his standing will of fallen)

 

Talent wise? Splash reel? In his prime? I'd take Smith in his prime against anyone...

 

Numbers are too big of a factor for HOF and WRs already struggle to get in with much much better ones.   I have always said, if Smith where to have a shot...it would be for him to finish off his POSTSEASON resume strong.  His postseason resume pace could of been a gamechanger for his odds....2 postseason runs and a ring? Maybe, he could get in if he played big.  Today, he simply doesn't have a HOF resume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You laugh, but others thought of Delhomme as a game manager. The concept is far from foreign. Google Delhomme and "game manager". What in the world? Perhaps it's semantics or plain old revisionist history on someone's part, but Jake Delhomme was a known game manager by more than a few.

they must not have watched more than a couple games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whatever comment was made about Drew Stanton, Shaun Hill, etc...that just ain't right.  You could say Jake Delhomme could outplay Manning, Brady, whoever on any given Sunday as well...

 

Smitty is a HOF talent.  He just doesn't have HOF numbers.  HOF is a numbers game.  If his career ended today, by the time he was eligible....nothing on his NUMBERS resume would standout.   His career yards will be his big number and by the time he is eligible it just won't be enough.

 

Talent wise? Splash reel? In his prime? I'd take Smith in his prime against anyone...

 

Numbers are too big of a factor for HOF and WRs already struggle to get in with much much better ones.   I have always said, if Smith where to have a shot...it would be for him to finish off his POSTSEASON resume strong.  His postseason resume pace could of been a gamechanger for his odds....2 postseason runs and a ring? Maybe, he could get in if he played big.  Today, he simply doesn't have a HOF resume.

 

I'm through with the rehash-Jake therapy feel-good session.

 

 

 

 

In regards to Smitty:

 

Today he has a "puncher's chance". Tomorrow, who knows?

 

Still, any derivative of poo and Smitty don't belong in the same sentence, and most certainly not in reference to a guy who (Megatron or Smitty) who hasn't even finished his career. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm through with the rehash-Jake therapy feel-good session.

 

 

 

 

In regards to Smitty:

 

Today he has a "puncher's chance". Tomorrow, who knows?

 

Still, any derivative of poo and Smitty don't belong in the same sentence, and most certainly not in reference to a guy who (Megatron or Smitty) who hasn't even finished his career. 

ok.

 

Smitty.  Can we just talk numbers in regards to HOF.  Nothing else.  If Smith's retired today....do you think he has the numbers?  If yes, do you think Santana Moss has the numbers?

 

I personally don't think numbers should be the end all be all...but I think you start the conversation just looking there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok.

 

Smitty.  Can we just talk numbers in regards to HOF.  Nothing else.  If Smith's retired today....do you think he has the numbers?  If yes, do you think Santana Moss has the numbers?

 

I personally don't think numbers should be the end all be all...but I think you start the conversation just looking there.

 

In regards to the literal numbers, which rightly or wrongly are many a person's litmus test to determining hall of fame material, you're more than likely correct, CRA, Smitty does not get in---not immediately. Not ever. But then when you take intangibles into account, and more importantly Steve Smith's impact upon his games and the game of football, perhaps he will get in one day (based only upon his play up to today). Will people's perceptions and thoughts on what justifies a spot in Canton hopefully evolve over the years which would help Smith and others get into the Hall? Maybe. Is it likely? Perhaps not.  My thing is that for what Smith brings to the game, especially when he was in his prime, so-to-speak, poo and Smitty don't belong in the same sentence, ever. Call my thinking on this clouded, "homerish, emo (which I am really not trying to convey)" or whatever, but that's my whole point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...