Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Press Conference on Name Change Live on NBA TV


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Guelli said they may reach out to those involved in the process of getting the name back once the measure passes the board of governors vote in reference to the "Bring Back the Buzz" guys who requested that question be asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is this "Back the Buzz" nonsense lol.  They should have just worked with the "bring back the buzz" guys instead of a cut off logo/sentence lol.

 

 

I'm thinking it's meaning for fans to now actually back the team. Hence the backthebuzz slogan. 

 

 

It's basically saying, you wanted it.. You asked for it... you said you support the team with a name change,, now put your money where your mouth is type of thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking it's meaning for fans to now actually back the team. Hence the backthebuzz slogan.

It's basically saying, you wanted it.. You asked for it... you said you support the team with a name change,, now put your money where your mouth is type of thing.

Yup.

Much catchier than support the buzz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha good lawd, I just read it like a cut off from the logo haha.

 

Also, what's this $144 over 18 months deal, where can I read up on it?

 

 

 

It's one of the pricing options at the Bobcat/Hornets site. I think it's actually 8 dollars a ticket starting out, but there's payment plans and poo. It's really like 688 dollars over two years for 82 games. Which still an incredible price to be honest, plus you get the nice warm up and an invitation to the VIP event next year. You can also get over 200 dollars in free food and drinks by selecting lower level seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
    • TMac is good, but he isn't pick 1 on a WR good.  Last year he would be below Nabers and Williams.  This year you could argue Hunter is the better WR.  WR at 1 better be a Calvin Johnson not a WR that disappears some games in college...
    • So because he's a projected top 5 pick he's should be the guy we draft.   Yet you say the other 2 QBs who are projected top 5 picks are not worth it because you think they aren't that good.   That's my problem with you. You just seem to only care about Tmac. I have yet to see you suggest anyone outside of Tmac. At least I'm open to other prospects.
×
×
  • Create New...