-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
You know damned well Canales had already seen. It was so fuging obvious to everyone but his (Young's) defense attorneys and lobbyists. When Canales took the gig he knew he had to prove something. Job 1. He did that by buttressing a weak player with every advantage he could provide, and letting him show who he was. Now, one small hurdle to being good is cleared. -
I don't have preteen children so don't have to hear that poo.
-
By Billy Goat · Posted
We pretty much have no money invested in the WR group. Even less once Thielen is gone at the end of the season. We have a promising 1st round rookie and nothing much else beyond that under contract once the year is done. At some point you have to pay the money and keep what you have if the production justifies the outlay. What's the point in losing it in the hope we find something similar in the draft, just because it will save some money? The defense is in need of all the high draft picks and it's going to be hard to find someone as good as Johnson in the later rounds, so that leaves you signing JAGs in free agency with the likely outcome being a trashy WR group. With that being said I would absolutely trade him if he made it clear he won't stay around regardless of the deal on the table.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.