Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettlemen continues to get criticism for not bringing in a WR


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Well Hopkins is already a starter on his team so your a little behind, but ill take your wager what's your bet?

Hopkins is already a starter before training camp?

I'm struggling to think of a poster here with a bigger hard on for one player than AB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to continue on this subject until somebody addresses the fact that Steve Smith is the only WR worth anything under contract past this season. Everytime I bring this up its ignored. So who wants to tell me what they think the Great Gettleman has planned.

Considering this is page 27, I figure this has already be said, but just in case...

 

Let's just assume that we had money to spend in free agency, which we didn't, but here's the free agent WR's for this year. http://walterfootball.com/freeagents2013WR.php

 

Is there anybody one that list besides Cruz who you'd actually want for the price they'd demand? 

 

So that leaves the draft. Was there any WR on the board in the 1st you'd want over Star? Same goes for round 2. Any WR that would be an instant upgrade and worth more than Short in the 2nd? 

 

I'm sure Gettleman would have liked to addressed it more than he did, but he played the hand he had. He brought in some mid-level guys who he hopes can contribute, and he he hopes one of the WRs on the roster develops (we have a bunch). 

 

Did he really fix the WR issue? Not really. Could he have given the constraints? Not without sacrificing e.g. not taking Star, or cutting players to free up space to sign one of the crappy overpriced WRs of this free agent class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering this is page 27, I figure this has already be said, but just in case...

 

Let's just assume that we had money to spend in free agency, which we didn't, but here's the free agent WR's for this year. http://walterfootball.com/freeagents2013WR.php

 

Is there anybody one that list besides Cruz who you'd actually want for the price they'd demand? 

 

So that leaves the draft. Was there any WR on the board in the 1st you'd want over Star? Same goes for round 2. Any WR that would be an instant upgrade and worth more than Short in the 2nd? 

 

I'm sure Gettleman would have liked to addressed it more than he did, but he played the hand he had. He brought in some mid-level guys who he hopes can contribute, and he he hopes one of the WRs on the roster develops (we have a bunch). 

 

Did he really fix the WR issue? Not really. Could he have given the constraints? Not without sacrificing e.g. not taking Star, or cutting players to free up space to sign one of the crappy overpriced WRs of this free agent class.

 

Multiple people havve asked this. AceBoogie wanted Hopkins over Star or trade back into the first for Hopkins.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Multiple people havve asked this. AceBoogie wanted Hopkins over Star or trade back into the first for Hopkins.

If we could have landed Star and Hopkins this year it would allow us to focus on a LT next year. We put ourselves in a bad position with an aging LT and #1WR with no replacement already on the roster.

I know Nicks gets brought up a lot and I would love to have him but I think the Giants find a way to keep both and I also believe they value Nicks over Cruz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could have landed Star and Hopkins this year it would allow us to focus on a LT next year. We put ourselves in a bad position with an aging LT and #1WR with no replacement already on the roster.

I know Nicks gets brought up a lot and I would love to have him but I think the Giants find a way to keep both and I also believe they value Nicks over Cruz.

The only way we could have gotten Star and Hopkins would have been giving up several picks.

You laughably talk about Gettleman being no different from Hurney but want more idiotic trades?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at next yrs FA list then you will see odds are high that we can sign an LT and spend the draft focused on WR and secondary! And here is the kicker, there is actually viable no.1 WR in next year's draft!

There were a few in this draft but we can agree to disagree. Where is the money going to come from for a top tier LT or WR? Still have Cam's extension and Hardy's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could have landed Star and Hopkins this year it would allow us to focus on a LT next year. We put ourselves in a bad position with an aging LT and #1WR with no replacement already on the roster.

I know Nicks gets brought up a lot and I would love to have him but I think the Giants find a way to keep both and I also believe they value Nicks over Cruz.

How could we get a LT in next years draft? Because most likely we would've had to trade our 2014 1st to get back into this years 1st...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could have landed Star and Hopkins this year it would allow us to focus on a LT next year. We put ourselves in a bad position with an aging LT and #1WR with no replacement already on the roster.

I know Nicks gets brought up a lot and I would love to have him but I think the Giants find a way to keep both and I also believe they value Nicks over Cruz.

 

Off the top of my head the ones available that I would look at next year are...

 

Hakeem Nicks

 

James Jones

 

Jacoby Jones

 

Golden Tate

 

Mario Manningham

 

Jerome Simpson

 

Jeremy Maclin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...