Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettlemen continues to get criticism for not bringing in a WR


jarhead

Recommended Posts

That's nuts! Britt is nothing but trouble.

Look at it this way, they have a problem and so do we.

 

They drafted Hunter to replace Britt, due to injuries and troubles. Essentially, they are prepared to lose Britt. The need a competent MLB and we may have one that we don't need and is WAAAAYYYYY over payed.

 

In this trade:

 

Tennessee gets a potential top-5 MLB. Will definitely get better at the position! They lose Britt, but they have already built themselves to lose Britt. 

 

We get a potential deep threat no.1 WR..........if he heals! Plus we get loads of FUTURE cap space! OLBs are easier to pick up on the FA market than MLBs. Worst case scenerio, Britt gets injured third game of the year then we release him or sign him up for another year. He is in his contract year and only cost us about 2.5 mil against our cap.

 

Think about it, we has more potential for us? Top 15 WR in a contract year or a MLB playing OLB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's to the Titans! Plus, we would have to have him ink a new more trade friendly deal! What do you think he wants to do........second fiddle OLB or his natural MLB?

DO NOT want Kenny Britt. We may as well talk with Titus Young if we're that desperate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, Kenny Britt pisses more talent than Titus Young has!

The key is getting something for Beason!

Point is,you're trading an as of late injury prone LB for an injury prone WR. Who also can't seem to stay out of trouble with the law.

IF we were to trade (or anyone fo that matter) for Britt, it'd likely be for a late rd pick. 5th at the most. He's gone regardless. Titans have little leverage in the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point is,you're trading an as of late injury prone LB for an injury prone WR. Who also can't seem to stay out of trouble with the law.

IF we were to trade (or anyone fo that matter) for Britt, it'd likely be for a late rd pick. 5th at the most. He's gone regardless. Titans have little leverage in the situation.

So you are fine with letting Beason go and getting nothing for him? Fug I would rather swap problems with Tennessee first before it comes to that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are fine with letting Beason go and getting nothing for him? Fug I would rather swap problems with Tennessee first before it comes to that

You don't have anything to base on your assumption that we will let Beason walk for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have anything to base on your assumption that we will let Beason walk for nothing.

He has spent the last 2 years on IR and is the owner of the largest MLB contract in NFL history.....even if he makes a comeback this year he isn't really tradable with his deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are fine with letting Beason go and getting nothing for him? Fug I would rather swap problems with Tennessee first before it comes to that

Doubt anyone would trade for Beason and that contract. That's a huge risk for any team. You'd essentially be trading for a player who hasn't played but a handful of games in 2 years. And they'd be paying him 10+ mill a year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else can really be done? Teams at some point know that the front office has to do something! His contract is a problem! Trading him to a team like Tennessee gives them first dibs on a potential beast at MLB and maybe inspires Beason to sign a tradable contract. It will also give us something in return!

If we don't act then we are stuck in this awkward negotiation stare down that will more than likely end bad for us! Either way, I'm interested in seeing how Gettleman turns this lemon into lemonade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has spent the last 2 years on IR and is the owner of the largest MLB contract in NFL history.....even if he makes a comeback this year he isn't really tradable with his deal

No argument on that, but we have no indication that he is unwilling to rework his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt anyone would trade for Beason and that contract. That's a huge risk for any team. You'd essentially be trading for a player who hasn't played but a handful of games in 2 years. And they'd be paying him 10+ mill a year

 

 

I may be wrong, but I'm quite sure Beason could sign a new contract that is more trade friendly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...