Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would be we better off without DeAngelo?


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

There's been a lot of talk about DeAngelo possibly being cut/traded before the season, but lost in that is the fact that the team as a whole might actually be better off without him, and I'm not just talking salary cap space here.

 

It may sounds odd to say that we're better as a team without a talented back like Williams, but if you look around the league at the teams that really run the ball well it's usually teams that have one true #1 RB. Maybe they have a #2 that gets a few carries here and there - or these days a QB who runs - but the most productive rushing teams are usually lead by a dynamic RB that is the clear cut starter and gets 15-20 carries a game.

 

I think Jonathan Stewart can be that guy for us, but that won't ever happen with DeAngelo on the roster. Mike Tolbert is more than capable of handling the #2 load while splitting time at fullback or if Stewart gets hurt Tolbert has shown he can take over a starting role in SD. But Stewart getting the bulk of the carries as our clear #1 back would really help the offense out a ton, IMO.

 

Most backs tend to get better as the game goes on and the defense wears down and they get into a rhythm running the ball. It's much tougher to do that when you're coming out every 4-5 plays so the other $40 million back can get enough touches to justify the money he's being paid.

 

So to me it's not a matter of cap space, but of Stewart legitimately being, IMO, a top-5 caliber back in the NFL who has never really been given the chance to take that role as 'the guy'. As much as I like DeAngelo and respect him as a player and what he's done for this team, I just think our offense would be significantly better off with Stewart carrying the load as the workhorse back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, we started running the ball a lot better after Stewart went out and DeAngelo got the lion's share of carries.

 

Going with multiple backs is a fine strategy, but you can't do it while you're paying multiple backs like elite, workhorse backs.  That just doesn't work.

 

I think we're better off without DeAngelo, but that is primarily due to the cap.  If they were the same age, I'd take DeAngelo over J. Stew, but factoring in age and cap, going with J. Stew and cutting DeAngelo is the obvious choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you described is is a coaching error, not a personnel error. DWill can still be on the team with Stewart getting the bulk of the carries. The fact that DWill gets more money should not automatically mean that he gets more carries -- it shouldn't even automatically mean that he gets around half the carries. I know this is hard with all the pressures that come with paying someone a lot of money, but it's the right thing to do. So everything else being equal, the team is better with DWill. The only reason not to want him is his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can never have too much talent. Ask San Francisco. Yeah, Stew will get you 5 YPC, but so will D WIll, and they'll both do it whether they get 10 or 20 touches a game, albeit with different volatility (ie Stew: 5, 4, 6, 2, 8 Will: 1, 2, 1, 3, 18). I for one, think that Stewart, WIlliams, Tolbert and Barner are an elite backfield, and that is what you need in today's NFL. Look at New Orleans with Thomas, Sproles and Ingram. And while yes William's contract likely isn't sustainable for 3+ years with Hardy and Newton's contract coming up, we have at least one more year of production to get out of #34.

 

I'll leave all y'all who say we should cut him come June 1st with this. Yeah Stewart might be better. Yeah, Tolbert or even Barner could pick up the #2 duties. But the fact remains that Deangelo Williams is still a really good football player and should be on our roster come week 1.

 

/rant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can never have too much talent.

/rant

 

In general, thats true. But if you are paying 90 million to 3 players in one particular position while you have desperate needs in others.... it doesn't exactly help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are a better team with him with no other factors taken into account

We have been and will be worse team with him on it because of his productivity over the last 2 years, durability, and salary

Him being on the team with this contract has handicapped our team from improving and the sooner we rip off the bandaid the better off our cap will be in the future when we try to resign our own players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, we started running the ball a lot better after Stewart went out and DeAngelo got the lion's share of carries.

I think the last game of the season blurs people's memories

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about J. Stew is year after year I keep thinking this is the year he finally and goes into complete beast mode and plays so well that the coaches can't afford to remove him from the game. He has been great at times and shown elite back skills but it never seems to sustain. Last year was his chance to really bust out when he was starting but he was just average. Maybe it was the blocking up front? IDK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all the 90 million figure is way overblown since Williams wont see all of his money nor will Stewart in reality. What we are paying them in cap space is roughly 11 million this year. Secondly what is lost in this discussion is not only the fact the fact that Stewart has not been shown to be durable or able to carry the load to this point but expectations are that we will rub more not less and Newton will be less oof a runner not more.

What also is missing is whether we are better as a team if one of our division rivals pick him up for cheap pumps him for info on our offense and runs him against us. We love DeAngelo when he plays for us but what if the Saints pick him up to run all over us. With Brees passing attack putting us in the nickel all day Williams could have a field day at our expense. Not only cant we use him if Stewart gets hurt but now he is a weapon against us. All for a player whose cap space is already accounted for giving up 10;million tonspend nwhen Anderson's cut is figured in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 90 million is fine to use because it is in a context of all the other contracts that are referred to in the same exact manor.

If we used the full weight of the running backs contracts but did not with anyone else it would be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to be clear: I'm not "downplaying" the talent around Bryce... I'm qualifying it. There's a big difference between saying, "we finally have building blocks that we're actually developing" and "we've done enough to say this is a finished product, NO EXCUSES!" It's possible to believe that the 2023 situation was bad and to believe that the current state, while improved, is still incomplete. That's not inconsistency; that's nuance. As for the footwork stuff, again, I've seen the same clips as others. The claim that Bryce is hopping to see over the line just isn't one I've seen corroborated by analysts or tape breakdown. "Both feet off of the ground to throw" happens a ton for QBs (ex: Mahomes, Rodgers, Purdy, etc.), especially when improvising. You're right that there were some encouraging flashes from Bryce last season, and it's nice to finally hear that after so much time was spent pretending otherwise. I'm not arguing that Bryce is elite, I'm just asking that we evaluate him using consistent, measurable criteria to determine his status as a top-10 QB... whether it's via 3rd down %, red zone efficiency, turnover-worthy plays, or yes, big-time throws (which, by the way, has been a valid part of QB evaluation across the league for years even if it wasn't used here during Kyle Allen or Teddy Bridgewater's years. For reference: Allen had 20 BTT at a 3.9% rate. Teddy had 17 BTT at 3.3%). Like you, I'm hoping to see a competent, entertaining offense this season. That's a baseline we can all root for, even if we don't have the same baseline for what makes a QB top-10 (which, to be fair, is what this conversation has been about... though I respect the attempt to reframe it).
    • I am optimistic that we might be on the verge of fielding a sustainable offense finally. The Bryce stats listed above are definitely encouraging. I don’t want to overly inflate this and disregard the previous 1 and a half seasons of production from Bryce and “cherry pick” stats but do hope the benching turns into an inflection point in his trajectory.      Lots of excitement heading into this season. 
    • Summary The 2024 Carolina defense posted a 44.9 grade last year, which was the worst in the NFL since 2020. They also had the worst receiving grade in the NFL despite a QB that emerged in the second half of last year. TMac is most likely WR1 in this class and is now WR1 in Carolina He's going to be incredibly helpful on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone. Highlights show just that: First highlight is Arizona vs. Utah. 4 verts vs. cover-0, TMac lined up alone on a go ball vs. press = we're launching it Second highlight shows his potential as the X. Runs a backside in-cut and the Tampa-2 MLB sells out on the corner route, leaving his back to TMac. Tough over the middle, explosive after the play. Sees TMac doing a lot of what Mike Evans was asked to do in Tampa. Third highlight shows how effective TMac is in the redzone and it's his one-handed catch vs. Travis Hunter. Brings "indefensible plays." Has size advantage that can beat guys, can jump, and has ridiculous hands. Will help Bryce in year 3 as it will allow him to continue playing "fearless" like he did after coming back from benching. Highlights show where TMac fits and re-emphasizes how he's going to make things easier on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone: Fourth highlight shows Bryce vs. ATL when he hit AT vs. AJ Terrell down the sideline. Bryce has to hold the single deep safety during his drop to give Thielen a chance (who is only 4yds off of the LOS when Bryce is throwing it). Registers the big-time throw attacking vertically. Fifth highlight is vs. KC on a blitz where Bolton is coming downhill while Karlaftis is dropping back over the middle. Has an in-route that has outside leverage with Chris Jones applying immediate pressure. Layered it over Karlaftis' head for the completion. Sixth highlight is the fade route TD to David Moore vs. Zona. in the redzone. David Moore was the X on this play. Thought this was interesting, especially considering recent conversations about Bryce's intermediate game needing to be better:
×
×
  • Create New...