Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

teams weren't offering much for williams


Recommended Posts

I do not appear to be the only one having trouble with the quote box. But, somehow that makes my points less... sophisticated.

 

I say DWill is the only RB with Homerun ability. Gloss over that fact all you want. Stewy, not going to happen. Tolbert, no way. Barner, maybe, but it is way too early to even speculate on him.

 

You may also gloss over the fact that I have agreed that DWill is too expensive. But until you replace him with a threat, he is our only option. Is that not sophisticated enough?

 

You can plug and play a RB in today's NFL. That does not however make him a threat to go to the house. Very few RBs are capable of taking it to the house, but DWill can. Sorry if that does not jibe with your opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

lol..  the worst defense in NFL history?  keep on keepin on bruh...  re-read this thread and then re-analyze who isn't all too smart...

 

I don't have to re-read the thread. Stop acting like you know everything, you don't know anymore than anyone else on this message board bruh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have to re-read the thread. Stop acting like you know everything, you don't know anymore than anyone else on this message board bruh

 

you don't have to be the coach to know the obvious facts...  so I still suggest you re-read this thread and get back to me.  Of course, that's your choice, feel free to do as you wish.  Just don't pretend like it takes inside info to know DWill only "breaking out" in 2012 didn't have to do with facing the worst NFL defense in NFL history...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8

That is not correct. The whole reason for the rule was to give a team that wanted to defer the money for two years but use the money now. I don't believe we used that rule but other teams did.

It is correct. We still don't have the JA cap space yet. The rule is in place to spread the cap hit over 2 seasons instead of one. You don't get relief immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIFY...

 

just move your direction arrows down until you're outside of the quotation box...  it works every time.

 

 

as far as you're rationale..  well, the reason you suffice to say you are good with messing up every quote may be why you are completely ignoring the fact that DWill isn't a homerun threat but seem to think that's the only reason he should stay on the team..

 

can't really argue either point...

 

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

 

This is what I get when I use the quote button. I get no quotes to frame, no quotation box at all. But because of a glitch, my rationale is obtuse? Well, I guess that clears up a bunch of things for me.

 

So, because you say the DWill is not a Homerun threat I am supposed to abandon my belief? Ok. I know I am older, but I didn't realize how far behind I was. Is that how this interwebz thingy works? You state your opinion until someone with a different opinion cancels you out?

 

I like having a threat in my backfield. Until we replace him, DWill is that threat. Is that really so difficult for you to see? No that is not a rhetorical question. But I do know the answer.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you don't have to be the coach to know the obvious facts...  so I still suggest you re-read this thread and get back to me.  Of course, that's your choice, feel free to do as you wish.  Just don't pretend like it takes inside info to know DWill only "breaking out" in 2012 didn't have to do with facing the worst NFL defense in NFL history...  

When did I say anything about inside info? Maybe you should go back and read my 1st post. All i'm trying to say is that keeping d will on the team is a better idea then releasing him, if you don't agree then oh well. Life goes on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. If Gettleman wanted that money from his contract to sign someone he could have done it months ago. Makes no sense to do it now. Gettleman doesn't seem to be one to change his mind in midstream. Unless he comes up with a trade with some unique wording I seriously doubt we are going to cut him.

I will stick to my guns. He'll be a Panther in 2013.

No. He couldn't sign someone until June 1st....bc the cap room doesn't exist even if Williams was designated a June 1 in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is correct. We still don't have the JA cap space yet. The rule is in place to spread the cap hit over 2 seasons instead of one. You don't get relief immediately.

Alright,

If we cut him because we drafted a 6th round running back I will be shocked.

The money you might get back from DeAngelo is not going to bring in anything better than what we have on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the discussion CRA, LaPanthra and Rayzor. I realize I am the minority in our discussion but as fans we all want the same thing. The best team we can have. I appreciate it not getting nasty and name calling. Seems like too many times I get into a disagreement with someone and it turns to name calling.

So have a good evening and GO PANTHERS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright,

If we cut him because we drafted a 6th round running back I will be shocked.

The money you might get back from DeAngelo is not going to bring in anything better than what we have on the roster.

have you seen the size of contracts that people are signing?

 

we absolutely could pay for a quality players with the amount of money we'd be saying....and i mean PLAYERS as in multiple.

 

and from a production standpoint, he wouldn't be hard to replace. in fact people drafted much later have been just as or more productive than him and it happens every year. people just aren't investing much in RBs because the level of production of high priced/early drafted RBs just isn't significant enough to warrant the price tag.

 

the idea of a 6th rounder replacing the production of williams shouldn't be shocking just because of what late drafted RBs have been able to do. for several years smart teams have been looking to late round RBs to get the job done and the amount of teams turning to them grows every year...and they do it because it's cheaper and there really is no step back in the amount of production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...