Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Playoffs Rd 2: (1) Miami Heat vs. (5) Chicago Bulls


NBA Playoffs  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win?



Recommended Posts

25 points, 8 rebounds, 7 assists for LeBron tonight. Heat go up 2-1. Nazr's shove on LeBron was a low IQ basketball play. He already got a tech on LeBron, then you foolishly get yourself ejected. And your squad is already shorthanded. Nazr cost the Bulls the game tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 points, 8 rebounds, 7 assists for LeBron tonight. Heat go up 2-1. Nazr's shove on LeBron was a low IQ basketball play. He already got a tech on LeBron, then you foolishly get yourself ejected. And your squad is already shorthanded. Nazr cost the Bulls the game tonight.

 

There is so much wrong with this statement that it's not even funny. You clearly didn't even watch the game and just looked at the box score.

 

The only way the Bulls can win this series is if they play physical and try to get in the Heats (LBJ's, Wade's, Bosh's) head.

 

The difference in tonight's game was the superb play of Norris Cole and the abysmal free throw shooting of the Bulls. If the Bulls shoot 85% from the free throw line (instead of 68%) and limit Cole's production then they win this game.

 

If we're being honest, the Bulls just didn't have enough in the tank to win tonight.

 

Oh by the way, Nazr Mohammed will never be the reason a team loses or wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so much wrong with this statement that it's not even funny. You clearly didn't even watch the game and just looked at the box score.

I watched the entire game.

 

The only way the Bulls can win this series is if they play physical and try to get in the Heats (LBJ's, Wade's, Bosh's) head.

And how's that working out so far? The Bulls are not as "physical" as the Heat. Everytime they go to that tactic they end up getting punched in the mouth. All the technicals, ejections, and crying is a bi-product of the Bulls frustration that they are no match for the Heat.

 

The difference in tonight's game was the superb play of Norris Cole and the abysmal free throw shooting of the Bulls. If the Bulls shoot 85% from the free throw line (instead of 68%) and limit Cole's production then they win this game.

And LeBron's 12 4th quarter points sealed the deal. He's the best closer in the game. Mr. Clutch!

 

If we're being honest, the Bulls just didn't have enough in the tank to win tonight.

If we're being honest, the Bulls wont win another game this series.

 

Oh by the way, Nazr Mohammed will never be the reason a team loses or wins.

The Heat outrebounded the Bulls tonight. Not having Nazr to spell Noah played a part in that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You beat me to it.

 

KT clearly didn't watch the game and just looked at the box score lol.

 

12 4th quarter points. Game was tied after 3. Looks like you didnt watch the game. Kevin Greene is a Kobe fan, he only looks at scoring. LeBron also had 8 rebounds, 7 assists, and 2 steals. He didnt miss a single FT. There is more to basketball than scoring.

 

 

BlowsDunk_original.gif?1368234640

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll have to agree to disagree then.

If we're being honest, the physical play of Noah, Muhammed, Gibson, Boozer, and Butler accompanied by the shooting touch of Belinelli and the all around great play of Robinson are the only things keeping Chicago in this series. So I would say the physicality definitely favors Chicago.

Yes LeBron had a solid fourth quarter, that three that answered Belinelli's was huge and the three point play where he drove and got Boozer to commit a foul for the and one sealed it. But without Cole and Bosh, the Heat aren't in the game to begin with.

By the wat, I think you're confusing LBJ and Durant when it comes to Mr. Clutch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lebron? 6-17.

Nice game Norris Cole, the difference maker in this contest.

I love it,,,Kobe has these poor shooting games all the time, but you're always here to tell us that it doesnt matter, because his objective is to get to the FT line where he kills his FTs. And here you are glossing over the 11-11 from the line in a win.

Good work, keep up the hypocrisy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...