Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we switch to a 3-4


Recommended Posts

Every body's sayin that we ain't got depth at dt which we don't and that good olb's are easier to find then good dt's which they are...so y not switch to a 3-4

Because in a 3-4, the front three have to be solid and big enough to consistantly take on double teams. Outside of Kemo and possibly Peppers, who else would fit that billing?

Besides, we are going to a Tampa 2 defense where speed, not size, is the preferred attribute.

We are built almost completely opposite for a 3-4 defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the 3-4, and I can understand you asking the question.

However, this team has quite a few high draft picks that would not translate over to the 3-4 all that easily. Not to mention we have some very good 4-3 players. Davis, Lewis, Beason, Peppers, Brown (hopefully)...etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys ever heard of the saying if ain't broke don't fix it. Are defense is not broke, it was a little sketchy at times with Trgo, at the controls, but we were far from a terrible defense. Everyone likes to point out how bad the defense performs, but not how bad the offense performed. All the teams that do well in the league have a defense that performs well for a good offense. No one wants to go back out on the field after they just came out. The Steelers, Patriots, Giants, Chargers, Ravens, Titans, and sometimes the Panthers and Colts are examples of teams that do somewhat well on both sides of the ball. The defense will perform if the offense will perform, which was shown in a couple of games this season against the Falcons: Score 24-9, Chiefs: Score 34-0, Saints: Score 30-7, Bucs: Score 38-23, Broncos: Score 30-10. In these 5 games, our offense gained 2,042 yards, while our defense only allowed 1,401 yards. Also in these 5 games our offense had 5 turnovers, while our defense had 7 takeaways. I promise you if the offense shows up then the defense will show up, and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the 3-4, and I can understand you asking the question.

However, this team has quite a few high draft picks that would not translate over to the 3-4 all that easily. Not to mention we have some very good 4-3 players. Davis, Lewis, Beason, Peppers, Brown (hopefully)...etc....

Wouldn't be suprised to possibly see some formations that mimic the 3-4 with the edge rushers we have i.e Brown, Taylor, Peppers and Charles Johnson. We have at least 3 DT's that could help us pull this off in Brayton, Kemo and the rookie Irvin. Sort of like a hybrid formation, similar to what New England does.

With that said, Fox has always preferred the 4-3 scheme, and this will always be our base formation. His conservative style and our current personnel pretty much guarantees we won't be deviating that much from this system, if at all, as long as he's at the helm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • 3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...