Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many Panthers will make the NFLN 2013 top 100

dpanther69

By dpanther69,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted

Although I know stats for d-linemen don't tell the whole story...if Dwight Freeney's old ass got in the top 100 posting 5 sacks and 12 tackles for an entire season, then Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy better make that damn list.  I know they probably won't though....a shame...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted

We should see Charles Johnson on it. Soon, probably. Cam certainly better be on it. That'll be it though.

4 is actually a pretty decent number, but this list has proven over the past few years to be pretty terrible in the way it's made and the way the data is gathered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewYork fan89 Newbie

NewYork fan89

Posted
Posted

First off, Dwight freeney last year had 5 sacks 12 tackles and 1 forced fumble so if he makes it and neither of our DE do that's asinine. Also I was watching reaction show they said 14 QBS are on the list. They showed 10 that are "guaranteed" they already had 2 on (Colin and stafford) which leaves 2 more. They asked you to pick from Matt Ryan. Tony romo, rivers, and Cam so there's a good chance cam doesn't make it. But remember Bob is lmao. Mr bob I throw at the line of scrimmage and occasionally throw the ball further than 10 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...