Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Day 3: Draft Discussion


saX man

Recommended Posts

Smith, Adams, Pilares, Lafell, Ginn, Hixon--covered at WR

Looks like DWill might now be a June 1st cut which will give us several million in cap room

Front seven in D got immensely stronger and should make the secondary a couple notches better automatically

OLine will still need to get better, with the return of Kalil, I expect it to.

Barring injuriies, this coming season will be much more fun than the last few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith, Adams, Pilares, Lafell, Ginn, Hixon--covered at WR

Looks like DWill might now be a June 1st cut which will give us several million in cap room

Front seven in D got immensely stronger and should make the secondary a couple notches better automatically

OLine will still need to get better, with the return of Kalil, I expect it to.

Barring injuriies, this coming season will be much more fun than the last few.

Those two aren't making the roster. Adams is a fumbling machine with no purpose (ginn and barner will return) and Pilares is ok receiver, but a UDFA or Gettis could easily replace him (and he he won't KR anymore),

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two aren't making the roster. Adams is a fumbling machine with no purpose (ginn and barner will return) and Pilares is ok receiver, but a UDFA or Gettis could easily replace him (and he he won't KR anymore),

You are right, I even forgot Gettis. We are more than covered at WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine what you guys would be saying to Saints fans who said "travaris cadet is on our team we are totally covered at WR".

That's the equivalent of this Gettis, Pillares, Adams, Ginn bullshit. Cut it out, you are embarrassing the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith, Adams, Pilares, Lafell, Ginn, Hixon--covered at WR

Looks like DWill might now be a June 1st cut which will give us several million in cap room

Front seven in D got immensely stronger and should make the secondary a couple notches better automatically

OLine will still need to get better, with the return of Kalil, I expect it to.

Barring injuriies, this coming season will be much more fun than the last few.

Cutting DWill will be a cap hit but if Gettleman can swing it I'm good with, as to not take a hit next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine what you guys would be saying to Saints fans who said "travaris cadet is on our team we are totally covered at WR".

That's the equivalent of this Gettis, Pillares, Adams, Ginn bullshit. Cut it out, you are embarrassing the team.

You are surprised that after using our small amount of cap room on 2 WR's, that we didn't go out and blow up the draft by taking several more. Slow down and think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been kind of amusing to see the team cheek spreaders try to defend the Barner pick.

Theyve spent months trying to pass of guys like Pilares and Ginn as weapon. Now we take Barner to fill that exact same role.

Put them in quite a pickle trying to figure out how they're supposed to spread their cheeks for both moves when the moves are conflicting.

The Barner pick makes Pilares, Adams, and Ginn all obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Barner pick makes Pilares, Adams, and Ginn all obsolete.

Which is good because they suck and we now have a hand-picked scat back to pair with Cam.

Ginn can possibly make the active-roster because its smart to have more than just 1 return guy and they're of course at different positions.

There's no doubt a glaring hole & problem at WR but we really could only address so many things this draft and according to Gettleman, weren't in position to take one over other guys that were on his board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...