San Francisco 49′Ers Reportedly In Trade Talks With Carolina Panthers

[Beast_3000]

-31, I'll take best available Safety: Elam, Cyprien, or Reid

-34, I'll take best available DT: Short, Jenkins, Hankins, B. Williams, J. Williams

-44, I'll take a TE or WR: Escobar, Woods, Patton, Hunter, Rogers

I feel like you were reading my mind with this post.

[carolina-chuck]

I feel like you were reading my mind with this post.

I'm your other half ;)

[Beast_3000]

I'm your other half ;)

Lol...Yeah ... I think most huddlers are unhappy with the thought of trading down that far, which is understandable. If we were able to come away with a combination of any of those players. We would get an A or B+ as a draft grade for our first two rounds.

[Miiikey]

Don't want it. 31st is a deeep pick. I want an immediate starter with #14. Would love an extra pick but not at the expense of picking 31st.

[cookinbrak]

How 'bout dis.....

Our 1st and 2nd (14 and 44) for SF 1st, 2 2nds, and our original 3rd (31,34,61,74)

[CCS]

Every single year I've been on this board and every single year I was on the Carolina Growl board before that, there was a group of fans who wanted to trade down because "this draft is really deep" I swear to God, I have heard that every single fuging year.

[carolina-chuck]

Lol...Yeah ... I think most huddlers are unhappy with the thought of trading down that far, which is understandable. If we were able to come away with a combination of any of those players. We would get an A or B+ as a draft grade for our first two rounds.

Yea, it is a big drop but when you only have two high picks to try and address three positions (DT/S/WR), there's no way thats happening. Theres no superstar in this class but it's filled with quality. If we're able to land three picks in the top44 picks, I'd be very happy. We should be able to find three starters with that.

[carolina-chuck]

Every single year I've been on this board and every single year I was on the Carolina Growl board before that, there was a group of fans who wanted to trade down because "this draft is really deep" I swear to God, I have heard that every single fuging year.

This draft is pretty deep

[carolina-chuck]

How 'bout dis.....

Our 1st and 2nd (14 and 44) for SF 1st, 2 2nds, and our original 3rd (31,34,61,74)

You're taking it too far

[carolina-chuck]

Don't want it. 31st is a deeep pick. I want an immediate starter with #14. Would love an extra pick but not at the expense of picking 31st.

Who's an immediate starter that we can't get at 31 that we could get at 14? I say the most realistic immediate starter we can get at 14 is Vaccaro. We could also get a Matt Elam at 31 who can be a starter day 1.

I think fans here get caught up that we have to get that Rookie of the Year again. At 14, it's not likely we're getting a 3rd straight ROTY player. We just need a capable starter for the future.

[Panther4lyfe]

How 'bout dis.....

Our 1st and 2nd (14 and 44) for SF 1st, 2 2nds, and our original 3rd (31,34,61,74)

That's even worse. We already moving down 17 spots if we did they should throw in a 3rd rounder anyway. (31st 34th 44th and there 3rd). Anyway I wouldn't want this trade anyway.

[Kurb]

You're taking it too far

Twss

[CharlottePanther]

Im all for us trading and getting more picks, but to move all the way down to 31? Jesus, who would even be a possiblity at pick 31? jessie williams I suppose

[The Golden Child]

Every single year I've been on this board and every single year I was on the Carolina Growl board before that, there was a group of fans who wanted to trade down because "this draft is really deep" I swear to God, I have heard that every single fuging year.