Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Masters

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

Does no one else find it curious that this relatively unknown "rule" put in place in 2012 has never been used until Friday?

Can you give a couple examples post rule change when it should have been?

Anyway:

Tiger Woods was allowed to stay in the Masters because of a relatively new rule that allows officials to waive disqualification penalties in special circumstances.

The USGA rule (number 33-7/4.5) was changed in 2011. It basically allows tour officials to not disqualify a player if instant reply after a player's round shows that he unknowingly violated a rule.

For instance, the USGA included this great example in the explanation of the rule (which we paraphrased):

A player unknowingly glances a few grains of sand on his backswing while hitting a bunker shot. No one notices it, and the player finishes his round. But hours later it gets slowed down to 1/16th speed on TV and you see that he actually hit that one grain of sand, which is a violation. Under the new rule, officials can simply give him a two-stroke penalty after-the-fact and waive the disqualification penalty for handing in an incorrect scorecard.

There are two keys that allow a player to avoid disqualification under rule 33.7:

  • No one realized he committed a violation at the time
  • The player didn't know and couldn't have known he had committed a violation

That final point is where things get dicey for Tiger.

He said in a statement on Twitter that he didn't know his drop was illegal. That's plausible. But for him to get saved by this rule and remain in the Masters, there had to be no way he could have known that he was breaking a rule.

His ignorance of the "factual circumstances" (as the rule puts it) had to be the same as a player who unknowingly scrapes a single grain a sand in a bunker shot.

The USGA provided another example of a situation where a disqualification penalty CANNOT be waived, which applies here (paraphrased):

A player moves a loose impediment (a clump of dirt, or whatever) in an area where his putt might end up while it's still moving. No one notices, and the player doesn't take a penalty. Under the new rule, he would still be disqualified after the violation was discovered through instant replay because he should have known that he couldn't move that clump of dirt based on the circumstances.

So, in essence, the rule that saved Tiger says a player can avoid disqualification if he didn't know he was breaking a rule, but not if he should have known he was breaking a rule.

Augusta is saying that Tiger couldn't have known he was breaking a rule when he took that illegal drop.

It's the definition of a judgement call. The rule states that waiving disqualification should be used in "rare situations where it is reasonable that a player is unaware of the factual circumstances of a breach."

Augusta had to answer the question: Should Tiger have known that what he was doing was illegal?

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/rule-why-tiger-wasnt-disqualified-at-the-masters-2013-4#ixzz2QSH23lLL

If Tiger knew he was breaking a rule at the time obviously he wouldn't have done it in front of Master's Officials, his peers and millions of TV viewers.

Now let's enjoy some great golf today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

Somewhere in history the rules of golf transmorphed from something logical and structured into something that 15 handicappers enjoy being dicks about. It's one thing if it is an official match or there is big money. But in a $10 Saturday match I could give a crap if your ball moved a cm or merely oscillated. You are laying 6 already how about we move along.

Can't stand playing with people like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

Somewhere in history the rules of golf transmorphed from something logical and structured into something that 15 handicappers enjoy being dicks about. It's one thing if it is an official match or there is big money. But in a $10 Saturday match I could give a crap if your ball moved a cm or merely oscillated. You are laying 6 already how about we move along.

Can't stand playing with people like this.

Aye, he who has the most fun on the golf course.....wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...