Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3, 3-4: Which one is harder to beat?


Doughboy88

Recommended Posts

Honestly right now I feel the best type of defense is one that applies consistent pressure out of nickel sets. Many of the best teams at doing this are 3-4 defenses, if I were to guess it is because a 3-4 defense is already used to working with 3 down linemen.

The panthers don't really play a true 4-3 and many teams are looking to diversify and play a hybrid system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you had the perfect type of player to play each position in either 3-4 or 4-3 im going to say 3-4 would be far more superior. in 4-3 you basically know whats coming at you. The disguise element with 3-4 with the perfect players can be pretty hard to read and beat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it after the Blackburn signing, & been thinkin about it since. I think Rivera is going to throw some old 4-6 looks this season. Like the read option, if used at the right time, could give the opposition some fits. Cant wait to see Brees & Ryan all frustrated cause the pressure is too much.... Dont go changing the whole system, just throw it in a few times a game, 3rd down mostly...

Dont know which is better, dont even know which I prefer to watch. 3-4 is fun cause of the disguising, the element of surprise, if you will. The 4-3, is a bit easier because you know whos coming, but can you stop it? I just realized I prefer the 4-3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personnel and Coaching is the biggest factor. You can quote number of teams that made the playoffs with a 3-4 but how many of those teams made it because of offense? Packers D sucks, New Englands D sucks, the Redskins were mediocre. I've always felt like the 3-4 was easy to run against and hard to pass against. Especially for non elite QBs. The 4-3 is the jack of all trades, master of none. But to be honest it's all about nickle these days. If you can cover the pass and play the run with 5 defensive backs then you can compete with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the right.players for a 43, is is the hardest to play against.

There aren't enough good 43 ends in the for most defenses to be 43.

There is always.more tweener guys coming out, so there will always be a healthy percentages of 34s.

Both defenses are can be great defenses.

Just takes the right personnel and execution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A sore d*ck is hard to beat.

The 4-3, 3-4, I leave that stuff up to you legitimate posters.

I will wait for Mr. Scot to chime in but from what I can discern, we do not have the personnel to run a 3-4 effectively yet.

Appreciated, but to be fair, I'm not the only one here who knows a thing or two.

What Rivera and McDermott want to run is a base 4-3 with occasional 3-4 packages thrown in. And yes, we have the personnel to do that. To run a 3-4 all the time? Not really. We don't have the "tweeners" you need at OLB for that, and our middle guys are true "mikes" rather than insiders. And I'd have to look but off the top of my head, we don't have anyone I'd want to throw in as a full time nose guard either.

Folks are correct when they say "hybrid really is the trend these days. And bottom line, with the right players and right coaching you can make either scheme work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...