Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McShay 2 Round Mock


Munch4455

Recommended Posts

lmao he is not a 3 tech if he line up at 1 tech NT. he may have had the size and skills to play 3 tech but he played the 1. Dwan has proved to not be that good at run blocking or taking on more then 1 blocker which is what a NT does, so are you willing to play Sheldon there at the 1? if so every NFL team will thank you for doing so.

Ok let me explain this Booger was a 3tech coming out of LSU (as Richardson Now) and play the 1 tech because the Tampa 2 depends on speed and quickness out of their DT's instead of Bluk and strength.

Just like the Wide nine in Philly with Cox and Jenkins last year. Which both are considered 3 tech in that defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok let me explain this Booger was a 3tech coming out of LSU (as Richardson Now) and play the 1 tech because the Tampa 2 depends on speed and quickness out of their DT's instead of Bluk and strength.

Just like the Wide nine in Philly with Cox and Jenkins last year. Which both are considered 3 tech in that defense.

considered yes, but again if Booger did not line up at the 3 tech DT how is he a 3 tech?Jerel Worthy was a 3 tech coming out of MSU, but got drafted to play a 5 tech in a 3-4. Tampa 2 NT will still have to be able to take on a double to free up the LBs, or they will get killed by the opposing OL. Cox and Jenkins are 2 guys who have shown the ability to play 2 gaps either in the pros or college so they could play NT some if need be. Booger played NT 1 tech, when Sapp was on the field. again no team would line up 2 DTs as 3 techs because you are leaving 2 gaps unattended to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok let me explain this Booger was a 3tech coming out of LSU (as Richardson Now) and play the 1 tech because the Tampa 2 depends on speed and quickness out of their DT's instead of Bluk and strength.

Just like the Wide nine in Philly with Cox and Jenkins last year. Which both are considered 3 tech in that defense.

Carolina runs neither of those systems and the system in place in Carolina really needs a big NT to clog the middle. So they both wouldn't start, one would be a reserve and see maybe 20 snaps a game at most. I doubt they'd take someone that would see so little time as I doubt he'd start right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://ind.scout.com/2/581106.html

Booger was a 3tech playing 1 tech and was way smaller then Dwan and Sheldon. So 2 3tech have been lined up at the same time.

I would add, in today's game. Pass rushers are a premium. Not run stuffers. Pass rushers used to be considered specialists. Well, in todays game, run stuffers are the specialists now.

I do believe folks put too much stock in the terms UT and NT. If you can play. Chances are good you will see the feild.. It is just a name given to the guy playing a certain position in a certain alignment.

All that said, we still need to add another kid to the DL. Hardy-3 years ago. Alexander-last year. Add another this year and keep perpetuating the cycle. Sound familiar. That does not mean a 1st rounder. Just a kid you believe can play. Perferably a 3-4th round guy. But hey, that's just me.

I want playmakers with my first two picks. Those usually come from conventional positions like WR, RB, and QB on Offense. With CB and DE for the Defense. Take RB, QB, and DE off the list and it leaves you with WR and CB. With DT heading the list of runner-ups.

Man, talk about a tangent. If you run a 4-3 you need 2 DTs. As long as they get it done, I don't care what they look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina runs neither of those systems and the system in place in Carolina really needs a big NT to clog the middle. So they both wouldn't start, one would be a reserve and see maybe 20 snaps a game at most. I doubt they'd take someone that would see so little time as I doubt he'd start right away.

Carolina does actual run a form of the tampa 2. Ron Rivera ran it in Chicago and brought some aspects of it here. Special on passing downs. He also brought some 3-4 and some of Jimmy Johnson's blitz packages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina runs neither of those systems and the system in place in Carolina really needs a big NT to clog the middle. So they both wouldn't start, one would be a reserve and see maybe 20 snaps a game at most. I doubt they'd take someone that would see so little time as I doubt he'd start right away.

With fewer and fewer teams geared to run the ball. Pass rushing will be a premium. If he can help my pass rush, he will see the feild. With Keek and crew, we are decent in run D. But being able to rush the passer with YOUR base D. That is priceless.

Wish we had a third so we could at least try and give DT a boost. Alas, 4th or later is all we can throw at a DT this year. Which is why I am hoping for a DT in FA. Cole will be this years Bell. Great story for him to be back in a camp. I would feel better if we had an insurance policy in place.

IF I could ask Gettlemen one question right now? It would be, What positions are in your BPA pool? WR, RB, QB, LT, DE, and CB? No where in there is one G or DT. Get that notion outta your head. We need WR, DE, and CB out of that pool. One of those three positons will be our first pick. Maybe even our first two picks.

Just me. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those names are positions. neither Dwan nor Sheldon have shown the ability to anchor, take on the double team and play the 1 tech position. a 3 tech and 1 tech have 2 different roles and jobs. if a DT can play both, great but right now neither guy can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina does actual run a form of the tampa 2. Ron Rivera ran it in Chicago and brought some aspects of it here. Special on passing downs. He also brought some 3-4 and some of Jimmy Johnson's blitz packages.

They run a variation of the Jim Johnson defense when healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considered yes, but again if Booger did not line up at the 3 tech DT how is he a 3 tech?Jerel Worthy was a 3 tech coming out of MSU, but got drafted to play a 5 tech in a 3-4. Tampa 2 NT will still have to be able to take on a double to free up the LBs, or they will get killed by the opposing OL. Cox and Jenkins are 2 guys who have shown the ability to play 2 gaps either in the pros or college so they could play NT some if need be. Booger played NT 1 tech, when Sapp was on the field. again no team would line up 2 DTs as 3 techs because you are leaving 2 gaps unattended to.

Your missing the point. If Booger can play the 1 tech (and he was bulit like a 3tech) then a player bigger then him and stronger then him can play that position as well.

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/pyrnotes.php?pyid=89459&draftyear=2013&genpos=DT

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=61052&draftyear=1999&genpos=DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your missing the point. If Booger can play the 1 tech (and he was bulit like a 3tech) then a player bigger then him and stronger then him can play that position as well.

http://www.nfldrafts...=2013&genpos=DT

http://www.nfldrafts...=1999&genpos=DT

again when has either player proved that?Richardson and Edwards are penetrators not anchors. every NT does not have to be a certain size, its about technique and the ability to not get pushed off the ball which both players have a problem with doing. that is why most teams looking at Richardson are looking at him as a disruotive 3 tech. you even said that he stays in the backfield, why put him in a position to not be successful.

if they are getting pushed off the ball in one gap, how do you think it will look when they have to cover two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again when has either player proved that?Richardson and Edwards are penetrators not anchors. every NT does not have to be a certain size, its about technique and the ability to not get pushed off the ball which both players have a problem with doing. that is why most teams looking at Richardson are looking at him as a disruotive 3 tech. you even said that he stays in the backfield, why put him in a position to not be successful.

if they are getting pushed off the ball in one gap, how do you think it will look when they have to cover two?

He won't be in that position all the time we will run a rotation. And the fact that he can do the 3tech some 5tech and can rush standing up and drop back. Makes him a nice piece to add to our defense.

With Ron's defensive mind and Richardson versatility it's a nice thing to think about. But I'm not married to him being the pick. I'm just having a open mind to the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I always get lectured every year when we inevitably win some meaningless late season games to tank our draft position that we're building culture and you always have to try to win no matter what. This is why that's bullshit. Once you're out of contention it's to your competitive advantage to LOSE. 
    • You’re tripping I hear what you’re saying but you’re not thinking of the benefits that trade gives us. We can then move around in the second round or late in the first to grab a specific player we covet like M Starks late in the 1st. Let me clarify if we’re at 21 we grab W Nolen or K Grant then trade up late in the 1 or early in the second giving up next years second for M Starks or T Amos there so much that can happen with that additional ammo.  Allowing us still so much leverage in next years draft as well with two first rounders we’d be dam crazy not to take a trade like that it’s not the big haul or heavy amount of picks we’re hoping for but it’s gets us multiple players especially ones we’ve seemed to taken a liking to like Nolen etc along with the safety from SC. or even a Luther B or James P early in the second. This nice influx in talent would help way more than a player like Jalon W. because of his high bust rate or probability  to bust….you know what I mean.  We need players we all know that those extra picks allow us to give up something this year to add key pieces from the 29-40 range that we may really like and have a need for (T Amos) and it not hurt as much because we’re stacked in round one of 26. Which could also be a pick one trade one scenario next year giving us more ammo to manipulate the draft to a winning situation for us long term. Al that to say we desperately need to be actively seeking a trade because we could add real talent in multiple spots this year and next with that current trade your opposing.
    • According to their list, the top guy hasn't put out a mock yet and the 2nd guy has us trading to 4 for Carter. 
×
×
  • Create New...