Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Been watching Patterson highlights

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

And I don't think he's top 20 pick... Dude looks so raw. Plus on many occasions he would slide to avoid a hit instead of picking up extra yards. Most of his damage came on his runs after catch and missed tackles... That's not gonna happen in NFL. Too much hype around this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

this needed its own thread. you act like your mel kiper or something... hey everybody ive been watching patterson highlights

I've read more stupid posts including yours.

Arsen actually kmows a thing or two about receivers.

What did you bring to the table in this discussion?

Nothing but the fact your an asshole. Something all men are born with.

Congrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IamSoClutch Newbie

IamSoClutch

Posted
Posted

I've read more stupid posts including yours.

Arsen actually kmows a thing or two about receivers.

What did you bring to the table in this discussion?

Nothing but the fact your an asshole. Something all men are born with.

Congrats.

Ive talked about patterson enough. yall just need to prepare to see him in carolina blue if he's there at 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaCityKats Newbie

DaCityKats

Posted
Posted

Thank you sir.

I want a WR in first round but I don't think Patterson is it. He will take time to develop. He would be #3 behind Smith and Lafell... Why spend 14th overall pick on a project?

why spend a #1 pick on a project QB?

playing DA here, but the guy has a special ability to become an elite WR and has played 1 year of major college football. with his skill set, and some coaching he could become a big time talent. he could help in the return game as well, but Ginn is here for that. not taking Patterson may be the reason why Ginn was brought in, and the panthers may want a more polished WR like Allen or Hopkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Community Regular

jtm

Posted
Posted

I don't think any analysts disagrees that Patterson is raw. However, the fact he is still the #1 WR ranked by most analysts combined with the fact that he is so raw, should tell you something. The guy is a freak and a playmaker

Outside of AJ Green and Julio Jones, very very few WRs make an impact in the first year anyway. Most break out in their 3rd year. There have only been a handful of 1,000 yard rookie WRs in the history of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

why spend a #1 pick on a project QB?

playing DA here, but the guy has a special ability to become an elite WR and has played 1 year of major college football. with his skill set, and some coaching he could become a big time talent. he could help in the return game as well, but Ginn is here for that. not taking Patterson may be the reason why Ginn was brought in, and the panthers may want a more polished WR like Allen or Hopkins.

Who had the greatest Season any QB has had in College.

I didn't think Patterson had the greatest season for WR. Did he???

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

Panthers cannot afford waiting 3 years with Lafell in final year of contract and Steve Smith going on 35. In my opinion Austin and Hopkins are much better option in late first round.

Last 2 Drafts we got day one starters in the 1st round. I agree with you I don't think Patterson is a day 1 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Davidson Deac II
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Davidson Deac II · Posted

      Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...